Top British Female Journalist Mentally Destroyed by Cyberbullying, Forced to Call in Security

[Okeefenokee]

My charge that you're both Chicken Fuckers stands on its own merits. But you have company

Monty does a lot with young cock. Just remember he was threating to sue people for misquoting him, I wore him down to a point now he is begging you to accuse him of bestiality. You may not like my methods but you can't argue with my results.

You never stop reaching for new lows.

You never stop reaching for cocks.

[clubgop]

My charge that you're both Chicken Fuckers stands on its own merits. But you have company

Monty does a lot with young cock. Just remember he was threating to sue people for misquoting him, I wore him down to a point now he is begging you to accuse him of bestiality. You may not like my methods but you can't argue with my results.

You never stop reaching for new lows.

No you have it backwards.

Chaos isn't a pit, it is a ladder to climb.

[Okeefenokee]

I have never seen a Peterson clip get so much press as this one, and this just pushes it further.

[Ph64]

You never stop reaching for cocks.

Just remember that it's illegal in Canada not to refer to that rainbow colored cock as "xir" now.

[C-Mag]

I have never seen a Peterson clip get so much press as this one, and this just pushes it further.

Yeah, it's gone viral, but is also showing some staying power.
IMO, it's because most people can relate to these types of ambushes in their work lives. Newman went in this to ambush Jordan and nock him down a notch, but she wasn't ready and or capable of debating him.

Look at Newmans body language v Jordans, Newman is constantly leaning forward, her eyes have a narrow focus, her right hand with the pen is often a balled fist.

[DBTrek]

C-Mag the fucking FBI profiler.
Lulz.

[clubgop]

I have never seen a Peterson clip get so much press as this one, and this just pushes it further.

Yeah, it's gone viral, but is also showing some staying power.
IMO, it's because most people can relate to these types of ambushes in their work lives. Newman went in this to ambush Jordan and nock him down a notch, but she wasn't ready and or capable of debating him.

Look at Newmans body language v Jordans, Newman is constantly leaning forward, her eyes have a narrow focus, her right hand with the pen is often a balled fist.

But Trump, what about Trump? Why won't anybody talk about Trump? All you Nazis want to talk about is free speech but Trump! Talk about Trump or I'll report you.

[C-Mag]

C-Mag the fucking FBI profiler.
Lulz.

I'd never work for the criminals at the FBI, but yeah, I'm into body language as a tool, not as the be all and end all. I'm waiting for a professional body language analysis of the interview, its coming....... we'll get to kick around this interview for a few more weeks.

[Hanarchy Montanarchy]

[JohnDonne]

You're either intentionally dishonest, or just slow.

He said, do you want a weak partner, or a powerful partner? and I don't mean powerful as in someone to control you, but someone competent.

You said he doesn't go after SJW. Bullshit.

You said cultural marxism is a meaningless term. Bullshit.

And I have a feeling you know all of that you just tried to slip through was bullshit.

Yes, he replaced the term power with competence as if they were synonymous, which they aren't. I assume he is resting on an unstated tautology that simply defines competent as powerful, which is dishonest.

I never said he doesn't go after SJWs. I said he goes after low hanging fruit in an uninteresting way. DB goes after SJWs in a more interesting way, and with funnier memes, and you don't have to slog through hours upon hours of Jordan Peterson's tragically annoying voice.

As for Cultural Marxism, I know what it is supposed to mean, but I have seen it used to describe just about everything, and a term that can be slapped onto everything doesn't do a very good job describing anything.

And, while I might be slow, I do try hard not to be intentionally dishonest, even on innernet.

You're either intentionally dishonest, or just slow.

He said, do you want a weak partner, or a powerful partner? and I don't mean powerful as in someone to control you, but someone competent.

You said he doesn't go after SJW. Bullshit.

You said cultural marxism is a meaningless term. Bullshit.

And I have a feeling you know all of that you just tried to slip through was bullshit.

Yes, he replaced the term power with competence as if they were synonymous, which they aren't. I assume he is resting on an unstated tautology that simply defines competent as powerful, which is dishonest.

I never said he doesn't go after SJWs. I said he goes after low hanging fruit in an uninteresting way. DB goes after SJWs in a more interesting way, and with funnier memes, and you don't have to slog through hours upon hours of Jordan Peterson's tragically annoying voice.

As for Cultural Marxism, I know what it is supposed to mean, but I have seen it used to describe just about everything, and a term that can be slapped onto everything doesn't do a very good job describing anything.

And, while I might be slow, I do try hard not to be intentionally dishonest, even on innernet.

I'm guessing in Peterson's world competence equates to power in that it is a good, reliable source of power. I don't think he did a good job saying how you can distinguish between someone that has a desirable competence and one that is emotionally controlling, especially since effective manipulation requires some level of competence. Nevertheless, I don't see him failing to outline this or something similar at that instant to be evidence of his "dishonesty", I wouldn't even know what his motivation for "dishonesty" in this case would be. It's true with Peterson a lot of times you get the thinker in progress or on the cusp of something and not the fully worked out theory. That sense that he is discovering something with the audience as he speaks is part of the compelling nature of his personality.

Certainly in one of the many roles Peterson plays "low hanging fruit" and him have a combative relationship, but in a culture where the low forms of discourse increasingly become the standard, I am glad there is someone reasonable to fight it, articulate what is happening and lend it the gravity that it deserves.

I like the term "Cultural Marxism", if Peterson himself has misused it at some point you should draw our attention to it, otherwise, I don't see your beef.

As for other people claiming he's some dangerous cult leader only out to enrich himself, I would say he makes money off of only a fraction of his productivity, which he well deserves, and he has the the option to form a cult at this point given his charisma and ability to influence, yet he has remained the same apparently honest and truth-seeking man of integrity as before he became famous.

Also, he has good biblical lectures.

But if you think he's over-rated I encourage you to keep giving more reasons, it's interesting to hear what his critics have to say.