It's almost as if both parties were encouraging people to vote against their own interests...

GrumpyCatFace wrote:Checkmate.
It's almost as if both parties were encouraging people to vote against their own interests...
jediuser598 wrote:Tell me where it's ok for the Courts and government executives to pass laws infringing the 1st, and 4th? The whole argument here is that both sides are infringing our rights, and continue to do so, but myopic people on this forum continue to spend most of the time on just one side of the argument, as if one side is much more guilty than the other.Zlaxer wrote:Ok, Jedi - put forth your best argument that it's OK for the Courts and government executive officers to pass laws infringing the 2nd Amd...I'll wait..
O, and please address as many counter points as possible....
Want an argument, a field for our sport? How about this one:
Who is responsible for the passage of the Patriot Act? That act eviscerated the 4th. (Do we need to debate this point?)
Let me link to you the vote totals: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2001/s313
The Senate:
The one Nay: Feingold, Russell
The House:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2001/h398
And of course the President signed it into a law, he's a Republican.
Still, a bipartisan effort.
I thought we were all unique and special.jediuser598 wrote:I do represent the average. Most people don't realize this due to the what's it called? "Lake woebegone effect," but most of you are average too. The world is made for average people. You calling me average, isn't an insult. I own it, instead of falsely believing, like you and many others, that "oh no, I'm at least well to the right of the bell curve." Got any proof of that? No? Ok, until further proof is provided, just going to go with "average." Or in the case of DBtrek, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" so you're going to have to provide *a lot* of evidence for that one. He proves he's a myopic dullard on the daily.Zlaxer wrote:I think he represents the average....
Your making my points for meJust read your own words....
DBTrek wrote:YHe’s just an empty vessel manipulated by agendas he doesn’t understand. Odds of the jedis of the world determining shit is precisely 0%. Tools are used to build, but they don’t actually create anything themselves.
I believe in the second amendment as DC vs Heller puts it.Zlaxer wrote:jediuser598 wrote:Tell me where it's ok for the Courts and government executives to pass laws infringing the 1st, and 4th? The whole argument here is that both sides are infringing our rights, and continue to do so, but myopic people on this forum continue to spend most of the time on just one side of the argument, as if one side is much more guilty than the other.Zlaxer wrote:Ok, Jedi - put forth your best argument that it's OK for the Courts and government executive officers to pass laws infringing the 2nd Amd...I'll wait..
O, and please address as many counter points as possible....
Want an argument, a field for our sport? How about this one:
Who is responsible for the passage of the Patriot Act? That act eviscerated the 4th. (Do we need to debate this point?)
Let me link to you the vote totals: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2001/s313
The Senate:
The one Nay: Feingold, Russell
The House:
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/107-2001/h398
And of course the President signed it into a law, he's a Republican.
Still, a bipartisan effort.
Seriously - where's your arguments relating to the second amendment? As for your arguments relating to the infringement of the 1rst and 4th - that plays right into my earlier point to DB - Americans no longer deserve freedom....
So do you believe in the 2nd amendment as written or not? and if the later - make your arguments.
As much as sand is unique and special, as much as ants are unique and special. Most of us are an ordinary kind of special. Let me ask you this, you think an average person could pass the bar? The one that you took?de officiis wrote:I thought we were all unique and special.jediuser598 wrote:I do represent the average. Most people don't realize this due to the what's it called? "Lake woebegone effect," but most of you are average too. The world is made for average people. You calling me average, isn't an insult. I own it, instead of falsely believing, like you and many others, that "oh no, I'm at least well to the right of the bell curve." Got any proof of that? No? Ok, until further proof is provided, just going to go with "average." Or in the case of DBtrek, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" so you're going to have to provide *a lot* of evidence for that one. He proves he's a myopic dullard on the daily.Zlaxer wrote:I think he represents the average....
Your making my points for meJust read your own words....
Yup, I'm working on this think piece about the capabilities of the average person. You really look at it, why be snide to the average person, why see that as a bad thing? There's this belief that being average, is bad, when in reality, most of us are. Average people fill the world, and this general disdain for them, for ourselves, isn't very constructive. (to borrow Smitty's) To wit, what can we do with average? What can we build with "average." That's what we have the most of, might as well use it, right?Speaker to Animals wrote:You are a unique, special snowflake. Just like everybody else.