-
Zlaxer
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Post
by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:08 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:07 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:51 am
TheOneX wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:47 am
It is not racist to not find a certain group of people generally unattractive to you for sexual purposes. What would be racist is thinking they are lesser because you find them unattractive to you personally, or trying to convince others that they should not date that race because you personally find them unattractive. Calling her racist because she isn't attracted to blacks would be like calling her homophobic if she isn't attracted to women.
If being gay isn't a choice, then why would the race we are attracted to be a choice?
Racism is discriminating based on race. Not sure why you are having trouble with this. If a chick doesn’t like black dudes - that’s a discrimination based on race. Whether it needs to be punished or not is the issue. I saw no because the right to self select a mate for me trumps the need to eliminate this form of racism.
This is exactly why SJWs always fail. You can’t eliminate personal affiliation and preference. We will never be an amorphous blob of ‘citizens’. Humans are tribal.
Implying that the individual has no right to choose her mate based on personal preference means that there is no right to select anything. Might as well have the state assign you a partner.
She’s not withholding an opportunity from the poor widdle black kid. She’s just choosing what she wants - same as an employer, same as a customer, same as a worker.
She is withholding an opportunity from the black kid - he’s not even in the running to get to home base…fuck, she’s not even letting him into the batter’s box.
My point is, some level of racism is acceptable, but saying i don’t date blacks dudes is not racist is no different the than woke’s logc.
-
SuburbanFarmer
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Post
by SuburbanFarmer » Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:17 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:08 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:07 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:51 am
Racism is discriminating based on race. Not sure why you are having trouble with this. If a chick doesn’t like black dudes - that’s a discrimination based on race. Whether it needs to be punished or not is the issue. I saw no because the right to self select a mate for me trumps the need to eliminate this form of racism.
This is exactly why SJWs always fail. You can’t eliminate personal affiliation and preference. We will never be an amorphous blob of ‘citizens’. Humans are tribal.
Implying that the individual has no right to choose her mate based on personal preference means that there is no right to select anything. Might as well have the state assign you a partner.
She’s not withholding an opportunity from the poor widdle black kid. She’s just choosing what she wants - same as an employer, same as a customer, same as a worker.
She is withholding an opportunity from the black kid - he’s not even in the running to get to home base…fuck, she’s not even letting him into the batter’s box.
My point is, some level of racism is acceptable, but saying i don’t date blacks dudes is not racist is no different the than woke’s logc.
Depends on definitions I guess. Tribal preference is always a part of humanity. You could call it ‘racism’, but that word has implications far beyond preference.
The problem is that SJWs are going far beyond equal opportunity in the workplace, and trying to oppose human nature. It’s what they do. And it will never work.
-
Zlaxer
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Post
by Zlaxer » Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:27 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:17 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:08 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:07 am
This is exactly why SJWs always fail. You can’t eliminate personal affiliation and preference. We will never be an amorphous blob of ‘citizens’. Humans are tribal.
Implying that the individual has no right to choose her mate based on personal preference means that there is no right to select anything. Might as well have the state assign you a partner.
She’s not withholding an opportunity from the poor widdle black kid. She’s just choosing what she wants - same as an employer, same as a customer, same as a worker.
She is withholding an opportunity from the black kid - he’s not even in the running to get to home base…fuck, she’s not even letting him into the batter’s box.
My point is, some level of racism is acceptable, but saying i don’t date blacks dudes is not racist is no different the than woke’s logc.
Depends on definitions I guess. Tribal preference is always a part of humanity. You could call it ‘racism’, but that word has implications far beyond preference.
The problem is that SJWs are going far beyond equal opportunity in the workplace, and trying to oppose human nature. It’s what they do. And it will never work.
1) That’s why I jested about whether not wanting to fuck your cousin is racist.
2) Of course it won’t work - that’s the point. Marxists know sowing unrest make it easier to bring about revolution.
-
Martin Hash
- Posts: 18733
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Post
by Martin Hash » Tue Sep 13, 2022 10:44 am
She is discriminating based on race. I discriminate every time I make a choice.
Marxism says the state owns your kids, and they make almost all choices for you, except wife. Indian & Muslim societies did that.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:00 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:08 am
SilverEagle wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:02 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 8:55 am
No - the right to freely choose a mate trumps the right to be free from discrimination.
Why is it “shitty for blacks”?
Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.
Oh fuck that noise!
There are plenty of blacks that only want to be with blacks because that is what they are attracted to. Absolutely nothing wrong with that.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder you dumb fuck.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:06 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:18 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:08 am
SilverEagle wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:02 am
Why is it “shitty for blacks”?
Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.
You trying to say excluding mates of a certain race is not racist is the same as the woke claiming men can give birth - your twisting a definition to uphold your world view.
In contrast, I agree that people should be allowed to exclude certain races from their pool of mates, but I recognize this is racist (a bad thing)… but I accept it because to me the right to freely pick a mate trumps rape - forcing someone to mate with someone they don’t want to.
Scarily - the cult of the woke would say ending racism trumps the women's right to life and/or procreation and try to eliminate her bloodline.
Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.
In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.
Yup! You hit the nail on the head!
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:09 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:34 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:18 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:08 am
Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.
You trying to say excluding mates of a certain race is not racist is the same as the woke claiming men can give birth - your twisting a definition to uphold your world view.
In contrast, I agree that people should be allowed to exclude certain races from their pool of mates, but I recognize this is racist (a bad thing)… but I accept it because to me the right to freely pick a mate trumps rape - forcing someone to mate with someone they don’t want to.
Scarily - the cult of the woke would say ending racism trumps the women's right to life and/or procreation and try to eliminate her bloodline.
Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.
In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.
I was looking at it from a single instance - not your bull shit institutional racism
Oh so my wife and my niece are racist according to you? We’ll you can fuck off because neither of them are.
By your own words a woman or man are not racist as long as they are willing to bang every race on earth. You are an idiot.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:13 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:52 am
SuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:49 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:34 am
I was looking at it from a single instance - not your bull shit institutional racism
I didn’t try to imply a systemic issue from an individual example - that was all you. I just swatted your weak ass shot back in your face.
How is saying I don’t like black chicks not discriminating based on race?
I don’t find fat chicks attractive so I never banged one. So by your fucked up world view I must be fatphobic. You’re an idiot.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:14 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:55 am
"Racism," especially the Marxist kind (Post Modernism), is any outcome where there is a difference between the races. The NBA is an example of a "racist" organization. So is the NFL. So is pet ownership: that's why dogs are "racist."
This didn't used to be the definition of "racism." Back-in-the-day, racism meant lack of equal opportunity rather than lack of equality.
100% correct.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________
-
SilverEagle
- Posts: 2421
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 11:07 am
Post
by SilverEagle » Tue Sep 13, 2022 11:15 am
Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:57 am
Martin Hash wrote: ↑Tue Sep 13, 2022 9:55 am
"Racism," especially the Marxist kind (Post Modernism), is any outcome where there is a difference between the races. The NBA is an example of a "racist" organization. So is the NFL. So is pet ownership: that's why dogs are "racist."
This didn't used to be the definition of "racism." Back-in-the-day, racism meant lack of equal opportunity rather than lack of equality.
Hey now - SE was the one “reimagining” the definition of racism.
No that would be you soy boy.
There is a time for good men to do bad things.
For fuck sake, 1984 is NOT an instruction manual!
__________