Beyond Woke

[SuburbanFarmer]

No - the right to freely choose a mate trumps the right to be free from discrimination.

Why is it “shitty for blacks”?

Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.

You trying to say excluding mates of a certain race is not racist is the same as the woke claiming men can give birth - your twisting a definition to uphold your world view.

In contrast, I agree that people should be allowed to exclude certain races from their pool of mates, but I recognize this is racist (a bad thing)… but I accept it because to me the right to freely pick a mate trumps rape - forcing someone to mate with someone they don’t want to.


Scarily - the cult of the woke would say ending racism trumps the women's right to life and/or procreation and try to eliminate her bloodline.

Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.

In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.

[Martin Hash]

Racism is the new norm.

Here's a list of the things that used to define liberalism:
Innocent until proven guilty
Freedom of speech
Freedom of travel
Sons are not responsible for the sins of their father
Equality under the law
Justice is blind
You are responsible for your own actions
Colorblind

[Zlaxer]

Why is it “shitty for blacks”?

Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.

You trying to say excluding mates of a certain race is not racist is the same as the woke claiming men can give birth - your twisting a definition to uphold your world view.

In contrast, I agree that people should be allowed to exclude certain races from their pool of mates, but I recognize this is racist (a bad thing)… but I accept it because to me the right to freely pick a mate trumps rape - forcing someone to mate with someone they don’t want to.


Scarily - the cult of the woke would say ending racism trumps the women's right to life and/or procreation and try to eliminate her bloodline.

Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.

In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.

I was looking at it from a single instance - not your bull shit institutional racism

[TheOneX]

It is not racist to not find a certain group of people generally unattractive to you for sexual purposes. What would be racist is thinking they are lesser because you find them unattractive to you personally, or trying to convince others that they should not date that race because you personally find them unattractive. Calling her racist because she isn't attracted to blacks would be like calling her homophobic if she isn't attracted to women.

If being gay isn't a choice, then why would the race we are attracted to be a choice?

[SuburbanFarmer]

Because they are being excluded from possible mates based on race - an immutable factor.

You trying to say excluding mates of a certain race is not racist is the same as the woke claiming men can give birth - your twisting a definition to uphold your world view.

In contrast, I agree that people should be allowed to exclude certain races from their pool of mates, but I recognize this is racist (a bad thing)… but I accept it because to me the right to freely pick a mate trumps rape - forcing someone to mate with someone they don’t want to.


Scarily - the cult of the woke would say ending racism trumps the women's right to life and/or procreation and try to eliminate her bloodline.

Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.

In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.

I was looking at it from a single instance - not your bull shit institutional racism

I didn’t try to imply a systemic issue from an individual example - that was all you. I just swatted your weak ass shot back in your face.

[Zlaxer]

It is not racist to not find a certain group of people generally unattractive to you for sexual purposes. What would be racist is thinking they are lesser because you find them unattractive to you personally, or trying to convince others that they should not date that race because you personally find them unattractive. Calling her racist because she isn't attracted to blacks would be like calling her homophobic if she isn't attracted to women.

If being gay isn't a choice, then why would the race we are attracted to be a choice?

Racism is discriminating based on race. Not sure why you are having trouble with this. If a chick doesn’t like black dudes - that’s a discrimination based on race. Whether it needs to be punished or not is the issue. I saw no because the right to self select a mate for me trumps the need to eliminate this form of racism.

[Zlaxer]

Plenty of white girls are attracted to blacks. They aren’t being ‘discriminated’ if a few of them can’t get a date with the white girl of their choice.

In fact, the implication here is that white girls are of a higher value than black ones. Pretty racist, if you ask me.

I was looking at it from a single instance - not your bull shit institutional racism

I didn’t try to imply a systemic issue from an individual example - that was all you. I just swatted your weak ass shot back in your face.

How is saying I don’t like black chicks not discriminating based on race?

[Martin Hash]

"Racism," especially the Marxist kind (Post Modernism), is any outcome where there is a difference between the races. The NBA is an example of a "racist" organization. So is the NFL. So is pet ownership: that's why dogs are "racist."

This didn't used to be the definition of "racism." Back-in-the-day, racism meant lack of equal opportunity rather than lack of equality.

[Zlaxer]

"Racism," especially the Marxist kind (Post Modernism), is any outcome where there is a difference between the races. The NBA is an example of a "racist" organization. So is the NFL. So is pet ownership: that's why dogs are "racist."

This didn't used to be the definition of "racism." Back-in-the-day, racism meant lack of equal opportunity rather than lack of equality.

Hey now - SE was the one “reimagining” the definition of racism.

[SuburbanFarmer]

It is not racist to not find a certain group of people generally unattractive to you for sexual purposes. What would be racist is thinking they are lesser because you find them unattractive to you personally, or trying to convince others that they should not date that race because you personally find them unattractive. Calling her racist because she isn't attracted to blacks would be like calling her homophobic if she isn't attracted to women.

If being gay isn't a choice, then why would the race we are attracted to be a choice?

Racism is discriminating based on race. Not sure why you are having trouble with this. If a chick doesn’t like black dudes - that’s a discrimination based on race. Whether it needs to be punished or not is the issue. I saw no because the right to self select a mate for me trumps the need to eliminate this form of racism.

This is exactly why SJWs always fail. You can’t eliminate personal affiliation and preference. We will never be an amorphous blob of ‘citizens’. Humans are tribal.

Implying that the individual has no right to choose her mate based on personal preference means that there is no right to select anything. Might as well have the state assign you a partner.

She’s not withholding an opportunity from the poor widdle black kid. She’s just choosing what she wants - same as an employer, same as a customer, same as a worker.