Okeefenokee wrote:jbird4049 wrote:True, but unlike the other governments, Syria's regime directly caused the war.
...That is what started the civil war.
Yeah, that was the immediate issue prompting the protests, and there were other issues in the other nations that prompted their protests.
I think it's probably true that the initial rebellion was prompted by the crack down by the government as well.
You are Assad, and it's March of 2011.
You watched the Tunisian president get toppled in January by protests that started in December.
You saw Mubarak step down on 11 Feb after 18 days of protests led to the US withdrawing support for him staying in power.
Six days later, protests started in Libya, and by the end of the month rebels held numerous cities in eastern Libya.
On the same day the protests in Libya started, the king of Bahrain sent in the army to clear out a protest camp at pearl square.
15 March, protests start in Syria. Crackdown begins.
19 March, NATO intervenes in Libya to overthrow Gaddafi.
You don't have to condone the crackdown to see the reasoning behind it. Bahrain is the only one of those four nations that didn't have their government overthrown or forced to step down. Assad could have given some concessions, the king of Jordan did and ended up still in power, but I don't think anyone can say that it's guaranteed that allowing the protesters to continue wouldn't have led to violence anyway or the Assad regime staying in power.