GrumpyCatFace wrote:We need a new term for AI that does not imply a consciousness.Zlaxer wrote:Fife wrote:Back to how this is related to the UBI hooey: When we subsidize consumption, and penalize production (or innovations if you prefer), guess which way the respective needles will go.
Except that AI is a game changing event that will break the model you are basing your position on. UBI would foster tons of consumption for sure - but the machines would be the slaves.....and the machines, assuming they're not strong AIs, don't care about being slaves.....
If automation comes to full fruition - the questions becomes one of resource distribution and population management. UBI, IMHO, preserves the most independence for the individual in such a system - the state doesn't get to decide how you spend your resources....its just decides what the minimum you get is. The problem is, how to keep the drive to innovate with taxation would be severe to support UBI. But if people tend to naturally create things when they have leisure time, perhaps such a system could work. Problem is - how to mitigate the problems of centralized government....
As for the problem of centralized government - use AI for it. Corruption is, and has always been, the biggest problem with government of any kind.
Its called weak and strong AI there Grumps...