BREAKING NEWS
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
The UK is the only country on Earth where you will get a stiffer prison sentence for speaking out against Islam vs raping a toddler. As long as you are a Muslim the government will not only turn a blind eye to toddler rape, but also offer you legal protection, only jailing truth tellers who shed light on this abhorrent behavior. Disgusting.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
At least I can own chimps.
In reality, not just on this forum.
In reality, not just on this forum.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
What restrictions do you propose? People already are not allowed to fly drones anywhere near airports.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:23 amSo you do approve of safety regulations, even if that danger does not constitute an end of the world risk?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:07 amLOLMontegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:05 am
Birds don't respond to 1km exclusion zones around airports, is that a good reason to scrap that restriction on drones?
What gives you the idea I think drones should be allowed to fly around runway operations??
My point is that the alleged threat is what we already face all the time from birds. It's not the end of the world.
I provided a simple solution to the problem which could be applied to all sorts of areas people are not supposed to fly drones.
I mean the world won't end if we let chimps replace pilots in commercial airlines will it?
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
Mandatory 5 year prison sentence for possession of a drone by a non-muslim should suffice.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BREAKING NEWS
I'm not suggesting any more restrictions. I'm pointing out that people are mocking the UK for wanting to reduce the chances of a drone hitting an aircraft full of people.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 12:49 pmWhat restrictions do you propose? People already are not allowed to fly drones anywhere near airports.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:23 amSo you do approve of safety regulations, even if that danger does not constitute an end of the world risk?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 11:07 am
LOL
What gives you the idea I think drones should be allowed to fly around runway operations??
My point is that the alleged threat is what we already face all the time from birds. It's not the end of the world.
I provided a simple solution to the problem which could be applied to all sorts of areas people are not supposed to fly drones.
I mean the world won't end if we let chimps replace pilots in commercial airlines will it?
Even though it's not the end of the world I consider enforcing existing laws to reduce risks, which are real, a good use of police resources.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
We're mocking the UK for being perpetual panic monkeys and supreme pu**ies on a scale never before seen by western men, sir.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:09 pmI'm not suggesting any more restrictions. I'm pointing out that people are mocking the UK for wanting to reduce the chances of a drone hitting an aircraft full of people.
That's all.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BREAKING NEWS
Fucking nanny state trying to stop drones hitting planes by legislating reasonable restrictions and enforcing them.DBTrek wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:15 pmWe're mocking the UK for being perpetual panic monkeys and supreme pu**ies on a scale never before seen by western men, sir.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 20, 2018 1:09 pmI'm not suggesting any more restrictions. I'm pointing out that people are mocking the UK for wanting to reduce the chances of a drone hitting an aircraft full of people.
That's all.
What we should do is wait until 300 people die in a crash caused by a drone before we take action.
We should take America's advice and wait until someone flies a plane into a skyscraper before we place any security restrictions on air travel.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 7571
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm
Re: BREAKING NEWS
You literally live in an Orwellian Shariah state and you are going to lecture Americans? We know what freedom vs. risk is. There was a time long ago when you guys did too. That was before the state sponsored cuckoldry became the norm in the UKSSR Caliphate.
Shikata ga nai
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: BREAKING NEWS
I literally don't live in an Orwellian Shariah state.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.