Explain why I should "pay more attention" to that and why? Because you're not making any sense. The only relevant word to care about when defining if something is racist is obviously what constitutes "a different race". Being prejudiced, discriminatory or antagonistic against fat people, or disabled people is not racist unless there is some sort "race", involved, after all.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Sat Feb 09, 2019 2:37 pm
I think you should pay more attention to the words ''prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism'' rather than splitting hairs over whether people are racist because they think rugby is superior to American football or some other national/cultural rivalry.
I'm not the one saying they'd be racist, I'm the one pointing how absurd it would be to call you criticizing US football "racist". Prejudice, antagonism and discrimination based on difference in nationality can simply be labelled "prejudice/antagonism/discrimination against people with a different nationality". If the word "vegetarian" came both to mean "someone who refuses to eat meat" as well as "someone who only sometimes eats meat", how could that improve upon the meaning of the word "vegetarian"?