“Denmark to force 'ghetto' children to learn about democracy, Christmas”

[Speaker to Animals]

Well, to begin with, the Dutch sound like fucking retards when they talk. Danes just sound drunk.

[clubgop]

About the one year olds... daycare and kindergarten workers have been left scratching their heads about that one, too. Because it will require them to monitor and document the "democracy development" of the child - otherwise government can't know whose kids are learning and not learning to be democratic. And how are they supposed to do that? Politician's don't seem to know. So, that part's not really popular - both because there's already alot of very unpopular bureaucracy and paperwork in today's public administrations, but also because that degree of social control and monitoring rubs childcare professionals here the wrong way.

They all do agree about the basics, though: That you can't integrate immigrant families if they keep isolating themselves and their children from wider society and the new cultural community they're part of.

And DB... Denmark's still not Dutch. I swear, you defend one foreign, funny custom nearly a decade ago and people just assume you must be from that culture.

Not black pete Danish are the guys with the Muhammad cartoons.

[DBTrek]

Danes must be made of butter, because DENMARK IS ON A ROLL!
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/denm ... ic-n878846

[Montegriffo]

There's a difference between promoting a local culture and banning a foreign one.
One is a positive move and the other is a human rights violation.

[DBTrek]

The term “human rights violation” is fairly arbitrary, given that leftists want to apply it to everything from chemical attacks and child sex trafficking to ‘no hiding your face in public’ policies. The phrase lost a lot of power as soon as the left co-opted it as a stand-in phrase for “things we disagree with”. Which, no doubt, also means this post violates your human rights, Monte.

/shrug

[Montegriffo]

What this law will do is condemn women to a life of never leaving their homes.
How is that going to help them integrate into Danish society?

[DBTrek]

If they choose to never leave their homes, then that’s fine. I’m not down with the whole leftist boondoggle of “If we do something, others might make choices we disagree with”. If they stay home, then they chose to stay home. No issue.

On the other hand, if you want to outlaw Danish cultural norms or public security practices because you speculate some Muslim women may freely decide to stay home after this law, then you’re a bit of a tyrant, aren’t you?

[Montegriffo]

outlaw Danish cultural norms

How did you come to that conclusion?
I'd say telling people what they can or cannot wear is tyranical.

[Montegriffo]

Human rights group Amnesty International called the ban "a discriminatory violation of women's rights."

"All women should be free to dress as they please and to wear clothing that expresses their identity or beliefs," it said.

[DBTrek]

Human rights group Amnesty International called the ban "a discriminatory violation of women's rights."

"All women should be free to dress as they please and to wear clothing that expresses their identity or beliefs," it said.

According to Amnesty International any nation that won’t let women freely walk through public butt-naked, save for a pair of earrings, has violated their human rights.

As I said, the left is blind to when it over-reaches and transparently co-opts phrases like “human rights violation” to mean “stuff we disagree with”. You guys can’t even tell when your condescending proclamations are easily disproved by the most cursory logical exercise, as I just demonstrated.
/shrug