Cop Was Happy About Posting a Weed Bust on FB

[DBTrek]

No need to fabricate me being "angry", DB. It's a lazy way to pretend to publicly win an argument, tbh. Try arguing for why I'm wrong instead, maybe?

What argument am I trying to win? You say weed doesn’t cure cancer. Ok. Then you go on to say people claiming medicinal use are just making excuses to get high. Well, that’s probably wrong, but no doubt some people are using the medical aspect to justify getting high. Then you get angry and tell people they need to just admit to wanting to get high and not speak of medicinal benefits at all.

Why? Why do you care so much? Why does it rile you up of some stoner says they toke for their glaucoma?

It would probably bother you a lot less if you got high.

[pineapplemike]

Isn't CBD oil helping kids that suffer from seizures and people that suffer from schizophrenia, or something? Curing cancer may be a bit premature but there appear to be several medical benefits that, I'm assuming, haven't been studied due to marijuana being a schedule 1 drug.

Anyway, I like weed. In moderation. Decriminalize it.

[BjornP]

No need to fabricate me being "angry", DB. It's a lazy way to pretend to publicly win an argument, tbh. Try arguing for why I'm wrong instead, maybe?

What argument am I trying to win? You say weed doesn’t cure cancer. Ok. Then you go on to say people claiming medicinal use are just making excuses to get high. (1) Well, that’s probably wrong, but no doubt some people are using the medical aspect to justify getting high. Then you get angry and tell people they need to just admit to wanting to get high and not speak of medicinal benefits at all. (2)

Why? Why do you care so much? Why does it rile you up of some stoner says they toke for their glaucoma? (3)

It would probably bother you a lot less if you got high.

1. No. I did not say that.

2. I am saying that those who have no medicinal use for weed, should not legitimize their use of weed by referencing how good weed is for other people who need it for medicinal uses. You know, personal responsibility and shit?

3. I am explaining. Nor would I get riled up by a stoner who says they toke for their glaucoma. If they have glaucoma. If they don't, they just make life more difficult for those who have a more legit need for relief.

I am already familiar with getting high, thanks.

[Fife]

Hey, whatever it takes to get the votes to make voting obsolete . . .

[DBTrek]

Weed "healing" cancer seems to be a popular fantasy among fools who feel a need to turn getting high into something either "profound", or pretend it's a miracle medicine.

Legalize it because you should have the right to get high if you like. But don't waste the world's time making it into something more than that.

(1) Yes you did

[Fife]

New weed thread.

[Speaker to Animals]

They voted for Gary Johnson.

[Fife]

Yes, voting is a loser proposition. Voting for Gary Johnson is a moronic, failure ab initio, proposition.

I was cracking wise. Let Mr. Aleppo out of your head; set him free.

[BjornP]

Weed "healing" cancer seems to be a popular fantasy among fools who feel a need to turn getting high into something either "profound", or pretend it's a miracle medicine.

Legalize it because you should have the right to get high if you like. But don't waste the world's time making it into something more than that.

(1) Yes you did

You're right, then. I did. I should have specified that the fools in question were the non-medicinal users. Should have worked a bit more on that post, I guess. My point comes across more detailed in the later responses to you and Kath.

[Speaker to Animals]

Yes, voting is a loser proposition. Voting for Gary Johnson is a moronic, failure ab initio, proposition.

I was cracking wise. Let Mr. Aleppo out of your head; set him free.

Negative. We should lock him up along with the other pothead libertarians. No legalization of marijuana until you guys stop doing this shit.