Yeah, it had Chaucer's Knight too.Smitty-48 wrote:You do realize that your Google "Top Tenz Greatest Knights" lists "Sir Galahad" as the "5th Greatest Knight" of all time? LOL. Nuff said about sourcing Google for your historical record, eh wot?

Yeah, it had Chaucer's Knight too.Smitty-48 wrote:You do realize that your Google "Top Tenz Greatest Knights" lists "Sir Galahad" as the "5th Greatest Knight" of all time? LOL. Nuff said about sourcing Google for your historical record, eh wot?
By your comical standards of historical reckoning, pretty sure Batman The Dark Knight trumps William Marshal, and Kal-El son of Jor-El trumps Jesus Christ too. Thanks O'Google.Montegriffo wrote:Yeah, it had Chaucer's Knight too.Smitty-48 wrote:You do realize that your Google "Top Tenz Greatest Knights" lists "Sir Galahad" as the "5th Greatest Knight" of all time? LOL. Nuff said about sourcing Google for your historical record, eh wot?
I heard that his wife was the granddaughter of the King of Leinster.Montegriffo wrote:Go on, Google ''greatest knight'' see what comes up.
Your Russian didn't even make this top ten
http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-plus-one- ... tory.php/31. William Marshal (1146-1219, English)William Marshal is the greatest knight of the middle ages because he satisfied all the virtues of knighthood despite the odds against him. He was immensely skillful with all sorts of arms; was loyal to his lord; defended the faith gallantly; won the favor of a great woman; was the most famous knight of his times and thereafter; was respected, diplomatic and merciful. He made his mark kicking the steel pants of all comers at the many tournaments held during his day, and that didn’t mean he won crummy trophies; no, he literally kicked ass and took names – so that he could ransom those defeated knights with their families. Aside from actual battle, the tournament was the one place a knight could enjoy combat, be seen by his betters, and display his prowess. And with the money William bought better arms and land, on top of gaining prestige.
We are talking about a bernie bro here. These are your gun grabbers. Probably had no training, if all you do is listen to the MSM like dirty dick does, they'll tell you it is point and shoot like a computer mouse. Zeroing? You expect these leftys to know anything about zeroing. Ask a leftist off the street what zeroing is a guy like monty, or gcf will tell that it some tax loophole only the richest 1% get. These fucks can't even get a proper sight picture, forget about zeroing.Smitty-48 wrote:How does one miss centre of mass with an AR at 30 meters? Should be able to land at least one round to the torso, even if you've never fired one before. Hang on a tick, do you Americans know what zeroing is, or do you just go straight from the gun shop to the mass shooting without even stopping at the range?clubgop wrote:Did anyone bother to read the article? The shooter came out from the the third base dugout area so he had some cover and surprise, while the two victims including the congressman was standing at around second. So most likely the LEO responding had a bad angle and was just putting shots down range to suppress the shooter. Looked like it worked. This martial American has a keen eye for detail.