Ph64, Why you messing with my when I'm having my annual toast of Crown Royal to all those American, British and Canadian Boys that shed blood that day ?
Smitty-48 wrote:It was Greenwald & Co that compromised her, they went and posted the actual document on the internet, and since she had made the copy on a colour printer, the embedded tracking dots gave away which printer it was and when, otherwise, would have been hard to catch her, but, once the journos had what they wanted, they burned their source without a second thought.
I suspect the journos of being in on it tbh, the Intercept cultivating her as their operative, like handlers.
How many people are aware of "tracking dots" and if they don't it wouldn't be burning their source.
It was fucking stupid to post an image of the physical document. Watermarks are used in securing documents all the time. It's not just governments that do it either.
If the NSA did not know that the CIA had the capability to spoof such attacks, the attack outlined in that document, if the document is to be taken at face value, could very well have been the CIA creating a paper trail to bolster their Russian conspiracy.
If the NSA did not know that the CIA had the capability to spoof such attacks, the attack outlined in that document, if the document is to be taken at face value, could very well have been the CIA creating a paper trail to bolster their Russian conspiracy.
There is a lot of goofy stuff going on with this election hacking. The government has a lot of explaining to do on this, we likely won't get answers. My questions below.
- If the US Government knew Russia was attempting to Hack state Elections, why didn't the government ever put out a warning to State Election Centers ?
- Why were Hack attempts made by our government on Indiana and Georgia ? Probably others too.
