Meanwhile in Ukraine

[Martin Hash]

You need another source of info… May I suggest “The Duran,” Judge Napolitano, Scott Ritter, or Colonel MacGregor; all on YouTube.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Who said that they hit it? Russia? Because I've seen nothing except idle chatter that nothing of value was hit.

I heard it on The Duran.

First I heard of it. Have to see in any contacts I know can let loose info.

But honestly, Russia is in a bit of trouble here. The stats of loss have come out lately, and Russia is looking to be hurt. This feels like desperation on Russia’s end.

They have over 700k that have been taken out of the battle (severely injured/dead) since this has started.

They have lost millions of tons of armor, and hundreds billions of value in a single country.

They are trying to put fear out there to keep Ukraine from doing what they are doing because they have no way to respond.

Honestly, if they wanted to show they were a threat, they should have taken out some of the defenses protecting the country.

Instead, they shot what looks like random things worth very little if no value.

Dude those are Verdun numbers lol
Check your sources.

[The Conservative]

I heard it on The Duran.

First I heard of it. Have to see in any contacts I know can let loose info.

But honestly, Russia is in a bit of trouble here. The stats of loss have come out lately, and Russia is looking to be hurt. This feels like desperation on Russia’s end.

They have over 700k that have been taken out of the battle (severely injured/dead) since this has started.

They have lost millions of tons of armor, and hundreds billions of value in a single country.

They are trying to put fear out there to keep Ukraine from doing what they are doing because they have no way to respond.

Honestly, if they wanted to show they were a threat, they should have taken out some of the defenses protecting the country.

Instead, they shot what looks like random things worth very little if no value.

Dude those are Verdun numbers lol
Check your sources.

Who’s numbers?

I'm not going by those. In going by my sources, I know people refuse to believe this but I do actually have sources in other countries that give me different stories than what the MSM gives.

I know people who are directly in the middle of the shit, the stories you don't hear such as Russia is pulling civilians to fill gaps. Those that refuse to answer, their families are punished.

I know one person that is trying to get out of Russia to call for asylum as we speak.

Russia plays it off as they have the upper hand, but the leadership questions that by quite a bit.


Suicide rates on the Russian front is high. Moral sucks.

The idea Russia has to create a union of power independent of the NWO is a good one, bringing back religion, etc…

The way he’s doing it though is the problem.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Same things we’ve heard about Ukraine for 2 years now. Nobody knows what the numbers are, but I’d bet anything they ain’t that high.

Best intel I’ve seen points to Russia committing a tiny fraction of their forces to this, and not breaking much of a sweat.

Morale is probably falling after 3 years in the field, but you’re not breaking a global superpower over a proxy war. That’s just silly.

[The Conservative]

Same things we’ve heard about Ukraine for 2 years now. Nobody knows what the numbers are, but I’d bet anything they ain’t that high.

Best intel I’ve seen points to Russia committing a tiny fraction of their forces to this, and not breaking much of a sweat.

Morale is probably falling after 3 years in the field, but you’re not breaking a global superpower over a proxy war. That’s just silly.

I don't think Russia is as in good of a place as they let on. They wouldn't have china call in NK troops if they were holding their own.

I have a feeling you are going to see land ownership change in things go as they are now.

[TheOneX]

Russia is not in a good place, but neither is Ukraine. It is in all practicality a stalemate. Both sides have taken heavy losses. As of today both sides are losing this war. Here is the key, though, as long as Ukraine retains NATO support it isn't going to get much worse for Ukraine as it is right now. On the flip side, the longer this war goes the worse and worse it will get for Russia. Any escalation, short of nukes, doesn't really change this equation, which is why NATO is support escalation. As long as Russia doesn't go to nukes, any escalation is going to cause more harm to Russia than Ukraine.

In a war of attrition Russia will eventually outlast Ukraine, but NATO is making sure it will come at a cost to Russia that could destroy Russia.

[SuburbanFarmer]

I don’t understand why anyone thinks that anything could ‘destroy Russia’ short of full nuclear exchange. They’re in the top 3 powers of planet earth. Ukraine is a rump state full of gangsters and our surplus guns.

Put down the koolaid dudes. This was never going any other way.

[Martin Hash]

Russia is, and always has been, in control of the situation. In the event of a ground war in the European theater, Russia would win against NATO. The U.S. could launch nukes but Russia could too and they are much more spread out; they would survive a nuclear exchange. I think the warmongers on the NATO side are women who don’t know what they’re getting into. Let Ukraine lose already; onto the next thing…

[SuburbanFarmer]

No way Russia beats nato in a conventional war, but it doesn’t really matter. First incursion into Poland gets a full polar exchange, and the survivors are fighting for food.

This entire thing is suicidal.

[Martin Hash]

How could NATO possibly win? They’re outmanned, little munitions making ability, and once the technology runs out in a couple months, are at a strategic disadvantage too. Plus, Russia is prepared for war having battle ground experience with drones. Not to mention that China would ally with them; the largest manufacturing capacity in the world. What’s NATO got? We couldn’t even get troops over there in this modern drone/missile environment if we had them.