We already knew that though.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:24 amThe fact that there’s clear illegal insider trading but no penalties means Elites are above the law so nothing can be done.
Vote for No Insider Trading
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
Dr. Fouchi’s financial records “publicly avaliable” my ass.
Wonder what he has to hide...
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... Disclosure
Wonder what he has to hide...
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents ... Disclosure
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
I don't know where else ot put this.
Why are so many Democrats leaving Congress, now at 29. The linked article 1/13/22 had it at 26. They claim because the Dems know they are going to get trounced and because Biden is so damn unpopular. I'm not sure that's the full story. I wonder if there is more.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb49q/ ... e-retiring
Why are so many Democrats leaving Congress, now at 29. The linked article 1/13/22 had it at 26. They claim because the Dems know they are going to get trounced and because Biden is so damn unpopular. I'm not sure that's the full story. I wonder if there is more.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb49q/ ... e-retiring
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
Toxic work environment, they made their money now they can retire without ever worrying about working again if they want to... they leave before the deck of cards falls flat on them and they get dragged through the mud... Biden... Pelosi, AOC... there are dozens of reasons, pick one and you are probably right.C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 6:35 pmI don't know where else ot put this.
Why are so many Democrats leaving Congress, now at 29. The linked article 1/13/22 had it at 26. They claim because the Dems know they are going to get trounced and because Biden is so damn unpopular. I'm not sure that's the full story. I wonder if there is more.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/7kb49q/ ... e-retiring
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
No matter what you do there will cutouts and workarounds. Blind trust is the best you can do to get rid of the blatant stuff. Insider trading for prosecution is hard to prove a blind trust lowers that threshold.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:15 amIn DC really? Everyone knows everyone... that was part of the problem with some lawsuits I thought in the past. Anyone on K street knows everyone else... and everyone is tied into someone somehow, it's worse than 5 degrees of Kevin Bacon...Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:12 amTrustor can have no contact with trustee.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 9:52 am
To put into a "blind trust"... I've heard those terms before... how blind can the trust be when everyone is connected?
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
If it's the best we can do, then we need to think something else up. I trust the government as far as I can throw a donkey without getting kicked...clubgop wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:25 amNo matter what you do there will cutouts and workarounds. Blind trust is the best you can do to get rid of the blatant stuff. Insider trading for prosecution is hard to prove a blind trust lowers that threshold.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:15 amIn DC really? Everyone knows everyone... that was part of the problem with some lawsuits I thought in the past. Anyone on K street knows everyone else... and everyone is tied into someone somehow, it's worse than 5 degrees of Kevin Bacon...
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
If you don’t trust the government why do you want to give them more power to unequally enforce this?The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:38 amIf it's the best we can do, then we need to think something else up. I trust the government as far as I can throw a donkey without getting kicked...clubgop wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 9:25 amNo matter what you do there will cutouts and workarounds. Blind trust is the best you can do to get rid of the blatant stuff. Insider trading for prosecution is hard to prove a blind trust lowers that threshold.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 10:15 am
In DC really? Everyone knows everyone... that was part of the problem with some lawsuits I thought in the past. Anyone on K street knows everyone else... and everyone is tied into someone somehow, it's worse than 5 degrees of Kevin Bacon...
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
I live in fucking Mass... my voice is unheard period.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:12 pmIf you don’t trust the government why do you want to give them more power to unequally enforce this?The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:38 amIf it's the best we can do, then we need to think something else up. I trust the government as far as I can throw a donkey without getting kicked...
I never said give the government power to enforce this, I said that there should be a way in where the laws already on the books can be enforced. If a blind trust is a best-case scenario, we need a new variant for politicians. Call it a Glass Trust, all money used to sell and trade, all transfer and donation interactions are open to public view without the requirement of a request.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
No thanks. And also not going to happen these are the type of laws Congress exempts themselves not pass to rule themselves.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:17 pmI live in fucking Mass... my voice is unheard period.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:12 pmIf you don’t trust the government why do you want to give them more power to unequally enforce this?The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Jan 28, 2022 11:38 am
If it's the best we can do, then we need to think something else up. I trust the government as far as I can throw a donkey without getting kicked...
I never said give the government power to enforce this, I said that there should be a way in where the laws already on the books can be enforced. If a blind trust is a best-case scenario, we need a new variant for politicians. Call it a Glass Trust, all money used to sell and trade, all transfer and donation interactions are open to public view without the requirement of a request.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Vote for No Insider Trading
If you don't want to know if they are taking advantage of their station or not, and someone provides a suggestion, in where you shut it down cold, without providing a counter. It's time for you to STFU.clubgop wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:07 pmNo thanks. And also not going to happen these are the type of laws Congress exempts themselves not pass to rule themselves.The Conservative wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:17 pmI live in fucking Mass... my voice is unheard period.
I never said give the government power to enforce this, I said that there should be a way in where the laws already on the books can be enforced. If a blind trust is a best-case scenario, we need a new variant for politicians. Call it a Glass Trust, all money used to sell and trade, all transfer and donation interactions are open to public view without the requirement of a request.
I'm not here to tolerate “that won't work so I'm right” mentality. Prove to me your worth my time. Because right now if all you are going to be is an antagonist, I got better things to do than to amuse your ego.
#NotOneRedCent