BREAKING NEWS

[SuburbanFarmer]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

[C-Mag]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

HOLY SHIT !!!

I was thinking Roberts was going to approve it on the basis of being legal because it was a Tax.

[TheOneX]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

It is amazing that the ruling wasn't unanimous. There is no law that comes even close to giving OSHA that power, the fact that even a single justice would think otherwise shows how far away we are from being a law based government.

[The Conservative]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

The healthcare workers is temporary until it goes through the courts.

The applications for stays presented to JUSTICE KAVANAUGH and by him referred to the Court are granted.OSHA’s COVID–19 Vaccination and Testing; Emergency Temporary Standard, 86 Fed. Reg. 61402, is stayed pending disposition of the applicants’ petitions for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and disposition of the applicants’ petitions for writs of certiorari, if such writs are timely sought.

[The Conservative]

Although I do have to ask, 84 Million Americans? Where is that number from?

That being said, this is the part that matters I think most:

The question before us is not how to respond to the pandemic, but who holds the power to do so. The answer is clear: Under the law as it stands today, that power rests with the States and Congress, not OSHA. In saying this much, we do not impugn the intentions behind the agency’s mandate. Instead, we only discharge our duty to enforce the law’s demands when it comes to the question who may govern the lives of 84 million Americans. Respecting those demands may be trying in times of stress. But if this Court were to abide them only in more tranquil conditions, declarations of emergencies would never end and the liberties our Constitution’s separation of powers seeks to preserve would amount to little.

[Martin Hash]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

It is amazing that the ruling wasn't unanimous. There is no law that comes even close to giving OSHA that power, the fact that even a single justice would think otherwise shows how far away we are from being a law based government.

Sotomayer intentionally read misinformation into the judicial record & it was not corrected.

[C-Mag]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

It is amazing that the ruling wasn't unanimous. There is no law that comes even close to giving OSHA that power, the fact that even a single justice would think otherwise shows how far away we are from being a law based government.

No Doubt.

Thank God for Trump. I have all kinds of problems with Trump, but if Hillary would have appointed 3 Justices

[The Conservative]

SCOTUS gets one right. General mandate is dead. But healthcare workers can still be mandated.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/sup ... xx-mandate

It is amazing that the ruling wasn't unanimous. There is no law that comes even close to giving OSHA that power, the fact that even a single justice would think otherwise shows how far away we are from being a law based government.

Sotomayer intentionally read misinformation into the judicial record & it was not corrected.

I know why it should be, but if you are trying to keep a narrative going, why would it be?

[C-Mag]

Questions: What are the legal ramifications now ?

Does this open private business and the government up to lawsuits for people that have been fired, or had Jab disabilities even though they opposed the clot shot ?

[Martin Hash]

Questions: What are the legal ramifications now ?

Does this open private business and the government up to lawsuits for people that have been fired, or had Jab disabilities even though they opposed the clot shot ?

Yes.