Coronavirus thread
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:16 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
I am betting if we tested everyone for the common cold, I am betting we would find it transmits at a similar rate as COVID, but the overwhelming majority of people never show a single symptom.
-
- Posts: 18727
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
How is Sotomayor so clueless yet so certain? I get the feeling we’re being set up?
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
This is on par with everything that Obama did...Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Jan 08, 2022 6:38 pmHow is Sotomayor so clueless yet so certain? I get the feeling we’re being set up?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Coronavirus thread
Absolutely devastating interview. I'll be following this guy's lawsuit closesly.
https://concerneddoctors.org/covid-the- ... ccullough/
https://concerneddoctors.org/covid-the- ... ccullough/
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
My wife has a nasty cold. We got to get her tested as required by her work.
We went to the COVID testing place and they set the apt to meet to get tested at 1:30. They texted us 10 minutes before saying it was pushed to 2:10.
We get there 2:05. Woman walks around testing people. We are told she needs to “sign in” so my wife did via phone.
We wait.
2:30.
2:40
2:50
No message for her being tested.
I call, the woman at the front desk puts me on hold. I'm looking straight at her, she goes back to her computer while I am waiting on the phone.
I tell my wife to. Wait here in the car.
She asks where I am going. I told her inside to find out what is the delay.
She said “I needed a mask”, I flat out denied it.
I closed the car door walked into the building and looked around. No one except the receptionist was there wearing a mask and behind 1” plexiglass.
I asked her politely “my wife had an appointment for COVID testing at 2:10, is there an issue?”
She said “The appointments aren't guaranteed times. “
I was beside myself. I said “Like hell, I have a child in the car with my wife to get tested for COVID.
Don't you think it be a good idea to speed the process along so just in case she had COVID she wouldn't spread it to the rest of us in theory?”
She said” You should be wearing a mask too.”
I said “i am more than 10 feet from you, you can go suck it.”
5 minutes later my wife was called in to be looked at.
Fuck this noise.
We went to the COVID testing place and they set the apt to meet to get tested at 1:30. They texted us 10 minutes before saying it was pushed to 2:10.
We get there 2:05. Woman walks around testing people. We are told she needs to “sign in” so my wife did via phone.
We wait.
2:30.
2:40
2:50
No message for her being tested.
I call, the woman at the front desk puts me on hold. I'm looking straight at her, she goes back to her computer while I am waiting on the phone.
I tell my wife to. Wait here in the car.
She asks where I am going. I told her inside to find out what is the delay.
She said “I needed a mask”, I flat out denied it.
I closed the car door walked into the building and looked around. No one except the receptionist was there wearing a mask and behind 1” plexiglass.
I asked her politely “my wife had an appointment for COVID testing at 2:10, is there an issue?”
She said “The appointments aren't guaranteed times. “
I was beside myself. I said “Like hell, I have a child in the car with my wife to get tested for COVID.
Don't you think it be a good idea to speed the process along so just in case she had COVID she wouldn't spread it to the rest of us in theory?”
She said” You should be wearing a mask too.”
I said “i am more than 10 feet from you, you can go suck it.”
5 minutes later my wife was called in to be looked at.
Fuck this noise.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
Thanks, I am just getting tired of this bullshit, the fear being produced by the ignorant, controlled by the gullible led by the power hungry leads to what we have now... that in itself is its own form of a pandemic.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Gabsters with a wild claim
I have serious doubts. However, this is essentially how Cargill monopolized global Corn production. They genetically engineered corn, then any corn with that DNA was there product. Even if your heirloom corn was cross pollinated naturally with your neighbors Cargill genetic corn.The US Supreme Court ruled that vaccinated people around the world are now "products", or patented goods, and are no longer human under US law.
By vaccinating with modified DNA or RNA, a person ceases to be a human and becomes the property of the patentee of the mRNA vaccine. Their genome is no longer human, but "trans-human", a category that does not exist in human rights.
The characteristics of the natural man and all rights that result from them are lost. This applies to the whole world.
SOURCE of this decision of the US Supreme Court in PDF:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/1 ... 8_1b7d.pdf
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
From the ruling:
It is important to note what is not implicated by this decision. First, there are no method claims before this Court. Had Myriad created an innovative method of manipulating genes while searching for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, it could possibly have sought a method pat- ent. But the processes used by Myriad to isolate DNA were well understood by geneticists at the time of Myriad’s patents “were well understood, widely used, and fairly uniform insofar as any scientist engaged in the search for a gene would likely have utilized a similar approach,” 702 F. Supp. 2d, at 202–203, and are not at issue in this case.
Similarly, this case does not involve patents on new applications of knowledge about the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Judge Bryson aptly noted that, “[a]s the first party with knowledge of the [BRCA1 and BRCA2] sequences, Myriad was in an excellent position to claim applications of that knowledge. Many of its unchallenged claims are
limited to such applications.” 689 F. 3d, at 1349.
Nor do we consider the patentability of DNA in which the order of the naturally occurring nucleotides has been altered. Scientific alteration of the genetic code presents a different inquiry, and we express no opinion about the application of §101 to such endeavors. We merely hold that genes and the information they encode are not patent eligible under §101 simply because they have been isolated
from the surrounding genetic material.
***
For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the Federal Circuit is affirmed in part and reversed in part.
Last edited by The Conservative on Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 25281
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Coronavirus thread
It looks like they granted a patent on the isolated genes that were modified, but I don’t see any claim of ownership over the whole code…