Current US Military

[Smitty-48]

The beatings are slavic.

Scots Irish

I'm a lover not a fighter

but I'm still an Ulster Scot

[Montegriffo]

The beatings are slavic.

Scots Irish

I'm a lover not a fighter

but I'm still an Ulster Scot

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58756429

[Smitty-48]

The beatings are slavic.

Scots Irish

I'm a lover not a fighter

but I'm still an Ulster Scot

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/58756429

you know, I wasn't racist when I was young

but now that you leftists have incited a race war, I'm going to have to side with the white working classes against you

death to Popery, and Environmentalism too

[The Conservative]

There is a difference between being racist and having a justified bias.

[Smitty-48]

Jesus of Nazareth said love thy neighbour perhaps, but he didn't say love the Romans

on that he said that the Son of Man would come from the Heavens to judge them

[The Conservative]

Jesus of Nazareth said love thy neighbour perhaps, but he didn't say love the Romans

on that he said that the Son of Man would come from the Heavens to judge them

And yet, he died on the cross for our sins... not exactly a worthy endevor in my opinion... cause since then we've fucked up good...

That being said, quoting religious scripture to me or vomiting religious beliefs to me won't make a lick of difference. There is a difference between having a bias and being racist.

[Smitty-48]

Jesus of Nazareth said love thy neighbour perhaps, but he didn't say love the Romans

on that he said that the Son of Man would come from the Heavens to judge them

And yet, he died on the cross for our sins...

only according to the Gospel of John, which was written by the Romans a hundred years after they killed him

according to Matthew, Mark & Luke, Jesus was crucified for saying he was "the King of the Jews", which was treason in Roman Judea

[The Conservative]

Jesus of Nazareth said love thy neighbour perhaps, but he didn't say love the Romans

on that he said that the Son of Man would come from the Heavens to judge them

And yet, he died on the cross for our sins...

only according to the Gospel of John, which was written by the Romans a hundred years after they killed him

according to Matthew, Mark & Luke, Jesus was crucified for saying he was "the King of the Jews", which was treason in Roman Judea

Moot point, and 100% irrelevant to my initial statement.

You can have a bias and not be racist since there is a difference, which most people ignore.

[Smitty-48]

And yet, he died on the cross for our sins...

only according to the Gospel of John, which was written by the Romans a hundred years after they killed him

according to Matthew, Mark & Luke, Jesus was crucified for saying he was "the King of the Jews", which was treason in Roman Judea

Moot point, and 100% irrelevant to my initial statement.

You can have a bias and not be racist since there is a difference, which most people ignore.

the New Testament is contradictory none the less, only the Gospel of John claims that Jesus died for our sins

according to Jesus himself however, that wasn't what it was about

[The Conservative]

only according to the Gospel of John, which was written by the Romans a hundred years after they killed him

according to Matthew, Mark & Luke, Jesus was crucified for saying he was "the King of the Jews", which was treason in Roman Judea

Moot point, and 100% irrelevant to my initial statement.

You can have a bias and not be racist since there is a difference, which most people ignore.

the New Testament is contradictory none the less, only the Gospel of John claims that Jesus died for our sins

according to Jesus himself however, that wasn't what it was about

Under the emperor, Constantine, and the Council of Nicea... you are right. But the bible was written by man well after the actions happened. Either way a moot and irrelevant point either way.