Coronavirus thread

[C-Mag]

https://www.infowars.com/posts/videos-i ... accinated/

Lolz - 4 shots now....


Only a surprise to the sheep.

Yep
And this is an example of why I'm being aggressive about this.

We seriously going g to argue about footnotes while they keep marching out more jabs.

And I firmly believe there are a lot of people ready to join our side. If there weren't stadiums wouldn't be packed.

[Zlaxer]

I firmly believe there are a lot of people ready to join our side. If there weren't stadiums wouldn't be packed.

People have already picked sides - it's not really about the jab - it's about leftists wanting to assert control over others, and the others not willing to go along with it.

There is no one in the middle to convince - the convincing now has to be on the right as to how to proceed.

[The Conservative]

https://www.infowars.com/posts/videos-i ... accinated/

Lolz - 4 shots now....


Only a surprise to the sheep.

Yep
And this is an example of why I'm being aggressive about this.

We seriously going g to argue about footnotes while they keep marching out more jabs.

And I firmly believe there are a lot of people ready to join our side. If there weren't stadiums wouldn't be packed.

They want you to "trust the science" but if you can prove that it's wrong and you are right, they have nothing to fall back upon.

That is why it matters... cripes.

[Martin Hash]

Sweden, Denmark & Norway have lifted all restrictions: obviously “the science” is immaterial.

[Zlaxer]

Sweden, Denmark & Norway have lifted all restrictions: obviously “the science” is immaterial.

No one actually believes it's about the science - the undercurrents are much stronger and everyone knows it now.

[C-Mag]

Sweden, Denmark & Norway have lifted all restrictions: obviously “the science” is immaterial.

Right On.

Japan and India have ditched the jab for Ivermectin.

This was never about science. Ram home the lies and dangers of the jab.

[C-Mag]

Sweden, Denmark & Norway have lifted all restrictions: obviously “the science” is immaterial.

No one actually believes it's about the science - the undercurrents are much stronger and everyone knows it now.

Not trying to be an ass.

But this is why we dont sit on a report because 14 pages of footnotes are not enough.

[The Conservative]

Sweden, Denmark & Norway have lifted all restrictions: obviously “the science” is immaterial.

No one actually believes it's about the science - the undercurrents are much stronger and everyone knows it now.

Not trying to be an ass.

But this is why we dont sit on a report because 14 pages of footnotes are not enough.

I said we should verify, this is like taking a wikipedia page at it's face value and realizing all the links it verifies to are to dead ends.

[DBTrek]

No one actually believes it's about the science - the undercurrents are much stronger and everyone knows it now.

Not trying to be an ass.

But this is why we dont sit on a report because 14 pages of footnotes are not enough.

I said we should verify, this is like taking a wikipedia page at it's face value and realizing all the links it verifies to are to dead ends.

I used to donate to Wikipedia to support free access to information - but they went woke, so I stopped donating about four years ago.
Now, every year, they send me an email asking me to resume donating - and I send back "When you stop being a bunch of partisan woke hacks" (in friendlier language).
This year they responded by saying I or anyone could edit articles if I thought they were unfair.
Lulz.
That's amazing - because you can also see the edit page of articles, and you can see woke mobsters censoring everyone.
But thanks for the info Wikipedia.

Go broke.

[The Conservative]

Not trying to be an ass.

But this is why we dont sit on a report because 14 pages of footnotes are not enough.

I said we should verify, this is like taking a wikipedia page at it's face value and realizing all the links it verifies to are to dead ends.

I used to donate to Wikipedia to support free access to information - but they went woke, so I stopped donating about four years ago.
Now, every year, they send me an email asking me to resume donating - and I send back "When you stop being a bunch of partisan woke hacks" (in friendlier language).
This year they responded by saying I or anyone could edit articles if I thought they were unfair.
Lulz.
That's amazing - because you can also see the edit page of articles, and you can see woke mobsters censoring everyone.
But thanks for the info Wikipedia.

Go broke.

That is sort of the point, people who are woke go to Wikipedia all the time and use their BS to verify their beliefs... this article no matter how well written is basically a love song to those desperate enough to believe it...

I remember hearing about if something is too good to be true, it normally is... that is why I want to verify before putting my voice behind an article...