Coronavirus thread

[The Conservative]

Hot damn. Long reading, but somebody is most definitely resisting.

https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/09/spartacus/

Wish there were references with this. Most people are going to report this and those who are brainwashed are going to say it's false data or fear porn.

There are 26 pages of references in the pdf of the letter. But I doubt that anyone who is brainwashed are going to be swayed no matter what until it becomes personal to them.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid- ... df#page=15

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

[Haumana]

Wish there were references with this. Most people are going to report this and those who are brainwashed are going to say it's false data or fear porn.

There are 26 pages of references in the pdf of the letter. But I doubt that anyone who is brainwashed are going to be swayed no matter what until it becomes personal to them.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid- ... df#page=15

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

What exactly are you imagining? Who is the we and who is going to judge that we as fools?

Read this goofy article about some delusional doctor who made up a bunch of bullshit on a FB post of his. Clown.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... P#comments

Then read the comments. There is no amount of ammo, data, or reason that will convince a lot of those people of anything other than what they currently believe. They are actually rooting for people to die and they are convinced that Trump was against this medical trial that everyone calls a vaccine even though it was his administration that hammered it through.

[Haumana]

I have a trip to Commifornia coming up week after next. I haven't travelled back there since late 2019 so I am really curious to see what is what in the former homeland post covaids. A recent trip into Honolulu here didn't have a good foreshadowing, people still trippy over masks, social distancing and general fear filled lives. I do wonder how many "x" the Bay Area will be.

Anyway, I ordered me one of these masks for where it will be compulsory like the plane ride. Their motto "“These masks do nothing at all - except get you in to schools, and work, and airplanes, and let you breathe! “



https://fakemaskusa2.com/

[The Conservative]

There are 26 pages of references in the pdf of the letter. But I doubt that anyone who is brainwashed are going to be swayed no matter what until it becomes personal to them.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid- ... df#page=15

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

What exactly are you imagining? Who is the we and who is going to judge that we as fools?

Read this goofy article about some delusional doctor who made up a bunch of bullshit on a FB post of his. Clown.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medica ... P#comments

Then read the comments. There is no amount of ammo, data, or reason that will convince a lot of those people of anything other than what they currently believe. They are actually rooting for people to die and they are convinced that Trump was against this medical trial that everyone calls a vaccine even though it was his administration that hammered it through.

So you post something damming the environment we are in and you don't expect people to gut it and take it apart of its legitimacy?

[Haumana]

[quote="The Conservative" post_id=356775 time=1632745484 user_id=7037

So you post something damming the environment we are in and you don't expect people to gut it and take it apart of its legitimacy?
[/quote]

Post where? Here? I expect scrutiny, and a fair consideration from some, but I didn't post this article. Subby did.

Elsewhere? Not really. I usually expect most to either ignore it or dismiss it out of hand . To be fair though, I don't think that anything they could say or present to me, as it stands right now, would convince me that Fauci isn't an evil fuck and this whole thing is an existential crisis that could only be solved by voluntarily enrolling into a medical trial.

[Haumana]

So you post something damming the environment we are in and you don't expect people to gut it and take it apart of its legitimacy?

Post where? Here? I expect scrutiny, and a fair consideration from some, but I didn't post this article. Subby did.

Elsewhere? Not really. I usually expect most to either ignore it or dismiss it out of hand . To be fair though, I don't think that anything they could say or present to me, as it stands right now, would convince me that Fauci isn't an evil fuck and this whole thing is an existential crisis that could only be solved by voluntarily enrolling into a medical trial.

[Zlaxer]

Wish there were references with this. Most people are going to report this and those who are brainwashed are going to say it's false data or fear porn.

There are 26 pages of references in the pdf of the letter. But I doubt that anyone who is brainwashed are going to be swayed no matter what until it becomes personal to them.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid- ... df#page=15

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

Article is suspect - if an academic or practicing MD wrote it then there would be inline footnotes or citations. References page looks like something a HS student put together - should be fixed if the data is accurate.

[The Conservative]

There are 26 pages of references in the pdf of the letter. But I doubt that anyone who is brainwashed are going to be swayed no matter what until it becomes personal to them.

https://www.docdroid.net/kZZXcGS/covid- ... df#page=15

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

Article is suspect - if an academic or practicing MD wrote it then there would be inline footnotes or citations. References page looks like something a HS student put together - should be fixed if the data is accurate.

That is sort of my worry....

[C-Mag]

I'll look at them, but if we are going to use this as ammo, we need to make sure those references are verifiable. Otherwise we are going to look like fools.

Nah, Fuck THAT!

That's what got us here. We have to justify everything with sources, documentation and a mile of footnotes, but our enemies never give us any proof. They just say the science is proven and go with propaganda. They've got half the country thinking that there are 57 genders when it is obviously fake bullshit to cover up crazy fuckers.

WIN THE WAR, then we can worry about rules and footnotes.

[C-Mag]

Article is suspect - if an academic or practicing MD wrote it then there would be inline footnotes or citations. References page looks like something a HS student put together - should be fixed if the data is accurate.

Stop with this. Stop using your white privilege to be balls on accurate and everything irrefutable. Your enemy doesn't care, in fact, that's what they want you waisting time on. We've been playing this game and losing. If we had a party that supported us, and the entire GOP took this as factual, published it everywhere, COVID would be over tomorrow. That's how your enemy is fighting this war.