not at all, Canada is the ultimate Anti-AmericaMartin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:53 amWhat's this? Snark?
that is the essence of Canada, what Canada is all about
not at all, Canada is the ultimate Anti-AmericaMartin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:53 amWhat's this? Snark?
don't threaten me with a good timeSmitty-48 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:54 amcome and save me from these freedom hating lunatics, America, please do
America is weak, there's no way to solve that problem in Afghanistan thoHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:50 amVietnam was already the Communists Vietnam.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:44 amin terms of hurting China, it is drawing them down a rabbit holeHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:41 am
How does leaving Afghanistan to the Taliban hurt China or strike a blow against big pharma?
making Pakistan China's problem is a good thing
let them get drawn into that
this was the original mission in Afghanistan, way back in 1979
let the Communists get dragged into that quagmire, make it into their Vietnam
China benefits whenever America looks weak, loses allies, and loses influence.
Capps' Art of War: Whatever, that airbase is lame, I didn't even want that one, I've got other ones.StCapps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:46 amAmerica have all the bases they need to attack any terrorists they want in AfghanistanHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:44 amChina, Russia, Pakistan - I mean, other than the Woke, which enemies aren't in that region?
You can keep saying there is no point to having functional airbases under our control, and you can keep being wrong.
/shrug
without having to stay in Afghanistan
let China have it
it's a quagmire for them to get bogged down in
never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake
I agree with your assessment; it's Hanny's over-the-top response that undermines his credulity in this discussion.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:54 amnot at all, Canada is the ultimate Anti-America
that is the essence of Canada, what Canad is all about
You are just making up counterfactual evidence now.StCapps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:52 amnot if those allies aren't worth staying in a quagmire forHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:50 amVietnam was already the Communists Vietnam.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:44 am
in terms of hurting China, it is drawing them down a rabbit hole
making Pakistan China's problem is a good thing
let them get drawn into that
this was the original mission in Afghanistan, way back in 1979
let the Communists get dragged into that quagmire, make it into their Vietnam
China benefits whenever America looks weak, loses allies, and loses influence.
and not if "looking weak" causes China to make a mistake that rallies their enemies against them, especially allies that aren't worth the effort
and both are the case, in this instance
cling to wasteful redundancies to stop China from charging into a quagmireHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:56 amCapps' Art of War: Whatever, that airbase is lame, I didn't even want that one, I've got other ones.StCapps wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:46 amAmerica have all the bases they need to attack any terrorists they want in AfghanistanHanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:44 am
China, Russia, Pakistan - I mean, other than the Woke, which enemies aren't in that region?
You can keep saying there is no point to having functional airbases under our control, and you can keep being wrong.
/shrug
without having to stay in Afghanistan
let China have it
it's a quagmire for them to get bogged down in
never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake
Real sharp strategic thinking. Ceding territory by leaving in a huff because, hey, at least the Taliban aren't Woke.
Yes, I was literally recommending a Canadian invasion force.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:57 amI agree with your assessment; it's Hanny's over-the-top response that undermines his credulity in this discussion.
well just bear in mind, America's first Vietnam was CanadaMartin Hash wrote: ↑Sat Aug 21, 2021 8:57 amI agree with your assessment; it's Hanny's over-the-top response that undermines his credulity in this discussion.