StCapps wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:49 pm
Monte is simply brainwashed into thinking that being considered part of the conservative right is a worse fate than being considered part of the woke left
so he sits on the fence and pretends that both sides are equally bad
thinking if he attacks the right, the woke won't come for him too, because he claims not to be one of them
which won't save him at all
it's naive and annoying to be sure
you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink
I just explained how he’s much worse than that. You’re describing Farmer’s fence-sitting, which while cowardly, isn’t evil.
Martin Hash wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 4:03 pm
I say “helicopter” and people flinch, but Monte is the true evil. It’s the difference between the 10,000 of Peron and the 100 million of Stalin.
Jesus > Peron > Stalin
no need to become the enemy to beat the enemy
Jesus knows
Last edited by StCapps on Fri Aug 06, 2021 4:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
StCapps wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:52 pm
want to miss the point entirely to uselessly virtue signal, while being guilty of an offense far greater than your supposed virtue?
apparently
I'm doing my bit.
99.99% of the population isn't.
stop throwing stones from your glass house, protip
Smitty-48 wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:36 pm
it's a nexus of Hegel, Nietzsche, Malthus, & Stalin
first you start with the Hegelian Utopia as the objective
then you succumb to the Nietzschean abyss , God is dead
then Malthus, man is the problem
then Stalin, no man, no problem
it's no coincidence that the first ever Green Party was the NSDAP
it's all about liquidating the people problem to save the pristine Environmental Utopia
I'm just being a good Thatcherite.
"For generations, we have assumed that the efforts of mankind would leave the fundamental equilibrium of the world's systems and atmosphere stable. But it is possible that with all these enormous changes (population, agricultural, use of fossil fuels) concentrated into such a short period of time, we have unwittingly begun a massive experiment with the system of this planet itself."
Margaret Thatcher's speech Speech to the Royal Society 1988
"What we are now doing to the world … is new in the experience of the Earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways. The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. Change to the sea around us, change to the atmosphere above, leading in turn to change in the world's climate, which could alter the way we live in the most fundamental way of all.
"The environmental challenge that confronts the whole world demands an equivalent response from the whole world. Every country will be affected and no one can opt out. Those countries who are industrialised must contribute more to help those who are not."
Margaret Thatcher's speech to the UN General Assembly 1989.
Checkmate
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Smitty-48 wrote: Fri Aug 06, 2021 3:36 pm
it's a nexus of Hegel, Nietzsche, Malthus, & Stalin
first you start with the Hegelian Utopia as the objective
then you succumb to the Nietzschean abyss , God is dead
then Malthus, man is the problem
then Stalin, no man, no problem
it's no coincidence that the first ever Green Party was the NSDAP
it's all about liquidating the people problem to save the pristine Environmental Utopia
I'm just being a good Thatcherite.
"For generations, we have assumed that the efforts of mankind would leave the fundamental equilibrium of the world's systems and atmosphere stable. But it is possible that with all these enormous changes (population, agricultural, use of fossil fuels) concentrated into such a short period of time, we have unwittingly begun a massive experiment with the system of this planet itself."
Margaret Thatcher's speech Speech to the Royal Society 1988
"What we are now doing to the world … is new in the experience of the Earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways. The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. Change to the sea around us, change to the atmosphere above, leading in turn to change in the world's climate, which could alter the way we live in the most fundamental way of all.
"The environmental challenge that confronts the whole world demands an equivalent response from the whole world. Every country will be affected and no one can opt out. Those countries who are industrialised must contribute more to help those who are not."
Margaret Thatcher's speech to the UN General Assembly 1989.
Checkmate
humor as a defense mechanism to keep dodging the point