Dark Days Ahead
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Dark Days Ahead
https://www.breitbart.com/latin-america ... -graffiti/
Reading the article shows how close we are to Columbia with respect to Marxists - good on those vols for having the balls to stand up to the left.
Leftists are truly vile specimens. Fuck'em. Nothing but hateful jealous demons.
Reading the article shows how close we are to Columbia with respect to Marxists - good on those vols for having the balls to stand up to the left.
Leftists are truly vile specimens. Fuck'em. Nothing but hateful jealous demons.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dark Days Ahead
Volunteers In a Communist Country ................. more like Voluntold or we'll kill your family. No different than the miners who Volunteered for a death sentence working under Chernobyl.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.breitbart.com/latin-america ... -graffiti/
Reading the article shows how close we are to Columbia with respect to Marxists - good on those vols for having the balls to stand up to the left.
Leftists are truly vile specimens. Fuck'em. Nothing but hateful jealous demons.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Dark Days Ahead
Did you read the article?C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:14 amVolunteers In a Communist Country ................. more like Voluntold or we'll kill your family. No different than the miners who Volunteered for a death sentence working under Chernobyl.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.breitbart.com/latin-america ... -graffiti/
Reading the article shows how close we are to Columbia with respect to Marxists - good on those vols for having the balls to stand up to the left.
Leftists are truly vile specimens. Fuck'em. Nothing but hateful jealous demons.
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dark Days Ahead
I skimmed it, what did I miss ?Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:22 amDid you read the article?C-Mag wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 11:14 amVolunteers In a Communist Country ................. more like Voluntold or we'll kill your family. No different than the miners who Volunteered for a death sentence working under Chernobyl.Zlaxer wrote: ↑Tue Jul 06, 2021 9:41 amhttps://www.breitbart.com/latin-america ... -graffiti/
Reading the article shows how close we are to Columbia with respect to Marxists - good on those vols for having the balls to stand up to the left.
Leftists are truly vile specimens. Fuck'em. Nothing but hateful jealous demons.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am
Re: Dark Days Ahead
-
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Dark Days Ahead
Real Clear Investigations Names Names.......... Ashli Babbits executioner finally named
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com ... 79601.html
Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio — Lt. Michael L. Byrd — and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won’t confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn’t denying it.
In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing. Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts — which, according to its website, provides “the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken” — recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as “Officer Byrd.” His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (see video embed further below).
Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.
In addition, Byrd’s resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting — a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.
Following the shooting, Byrd’s Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.
Phone calls and emails to Byrd, who lives in Maryland where he remains on paid administrative leave, went unanswered. His attorney would neither confirm nor deny that the 53-year-old Byrd is the shooter, and warned that disclosing his name poses a safety risk to the officer.
The Babbitt family is frustrated USCP won’t release any information about the incident other than the terse and vaguely written statement it issued on Jan. 7: “[A] sworn USCP employee discharged their service weapon, striking an adult female.”
Because Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests, the family is suing the D.C. Police “for documents that identify the officer who shot Babbitt ... as well as notes and summaries of what the officer said regarding the shooting and the reasons he discharged his weapon.”
Key question, what was Lt Byrds justification for firing his weapon ?
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com ... 79601.html
Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio — Lt. Michael L. Byrd — and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won’t confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn’t denying it.
In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing. Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts — which, according to its website, provides “the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken” — recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as “Officer Byrd.” His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (see video embed further below).
Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.
In addition, Byrd’s resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting — a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.
Following the shooting, Byrd’s Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.
Phone calls and emails to Byrd, who lives in Maryland where he remains on paid administrative leave, went unanswered. His attorney would neither confirm nor deny that the 53-year-old Byrd is the shooter, and warned that disclosing his name poses a safety risk to the officer.
The Babbitt family is frustrated USCP won’t release any information about the incident other than the terse and vaguely written statement it issued on Jan. 7: “[A] sworn USCP employee discharged their service weapon, striking an adult female.”
Because Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests, the family is suing the D.C. Police “for documents that identify the officer who shot Babbitt ... as well as notes and summaries of what the officer said regarding the shooting and the reasons he discharged his weapon.”
Key question, what was Lt Byrds justification for firing his weapon ?
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Dark Days Ahead
Scared while black?C-Mag wrote: ↑Thu Jul 08, 2021 10:10 amReal Clear Investigations Names Names.......... Ashli Babbits executioner finally named
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com ... 79601.html
Now a new name has surfaced in the Babbitt imbroglio — Lt. Michael L. Byrd — and while USCP Communications Director Eva Malecki won’t confirm he is the shooter, in this case she isn’t denying it.
In a little-noticed exchange, Byrd was cited by the acting House sergeant at arms during a brief discussion of the officer who shot Babbitt at a Feb. 25 House hearing. Both C-SPAN and CNN removed his name from transcripts, but CQ Transcripts — which, according to its website, provides “the complete word from Capitol Hill; exactly as it was spoken” — recorded the Capitol official, Timothy Blodgett, referring to the cop as “Officer Byrd.” His name is clearly audible in the videotape of the hearing (see video embed further below).
Byrd appears to match the description of the shooter, who video footage shows is an African American dressed that day in a business suit. Jewelry, including a beaded bracelet and lapel pin, also match up with photos of Byrd.
In addition, Byrd’s resume lines up with what is known about the experience and position of the officer involved in the shooting — a veteran USCP officer who holds the rank of lieutenant and is the commander of the House Chamber Section of the Capitol Police.
Following the shooting, Byrd’s Internet footprint was scrubbed, including his social media and personal photos.
Phone calls and emails to Byrd, who lives in Maryland where he remains on paid administrative leave, went unanswered. His attorney would neither confirm nor deny that the 53-year-old Byrd is the shooter, and warned that disclosing his name poses a safety risk to the officer.
The Babbitt family is frustrated USCP won’t release any information about the incident other than the terse and vaguely written statement it issued on Jan. 7: “[A] sworn USCP employee discharged their service weapon, striking an adult female.”
Because Congress has exempted the USCP from Freedom of Information Act requests, the family is suing the D.C. Police “for documents that identify the officer who shot Babbitt ... as well as notes and summaries of what the officer said regarding the shooting and the reasons he discharged his weapon.”
Key question, what was Lt Byrds justification for firing his weapon ?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: Dark Days Ahead
Same justification as would exist if the government ever bothered to put down the BLM rioters.
Violent mobs are free game for suppression by government forces.
The only reason it's not obvious is because the government (federal and state) allows violent leftist mobs to do as they please. So of course, when they finally take action against a mob breaking in the doors of the capitol, people are confused - since banging down a door seems less violent than the mass burning and looting that the government allows to go unchecked the rest of the time.
Violent mobs are free game for suppression by government forces.
The only reason it's not obvious is because the government (federal and state) allows violent leftist mobs to do as they please. So of course, when they finally take action against a mob breaking in the doors of the capitol, people are confused - since banging down a door seems less violent than the mass burning and looting that the government allows to go unchecked the rest of the time.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: Dark Days Ahead
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Posts: 26035
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:23 pm
Re: Dark Days Ahead
I drove by that one baseball stadium in Boston. I guess it's pretty famous. Anyway it has a giant black lives matter paint job now. Kind of gay