2nd Amendment Thread

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by C-Mag » Mon May 17, 2021 2:42 pm

SuburbanFarmer wrote:
Mon May 17, 2021 2:34 pm
The very core of the Fourth Amendment,” Thomas wrote, is the “right of a man to retreat into his own home and there be free from unreasonable search and seizure.”
Oh do tell.
:evil: The fact that this had to go to the SCOTUS to be decided.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by doc_loliday » Mon May 17, 2021 7:09 pm

Fuckin red flag laws man.

There is some dna level shit in a big part of humanity that just needs boots on them.

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by C-Mag » Thu May 27, 2021 10:11 pm

Future ATF Commissar wants to ban Assault Weapons, but can't define what an Assault Weapon is.
https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1 ... 3Dmsn_feed
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by Zlaxer » Fri May 28, 2021 4:43 am

C-Mag wrote:
Thu May 27, 2021 10:11 pm
Future ATF Commissar wants to ban Assault Weapons, but can't define what an Assault Weapon is.
https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1 ... 3Dmsn_feed

Let’s see him do it - then let’s watch red states pass nullification laws - then let’s watch Marshall’s try to enforce….

Popcorn anyone?

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by C-Mag » Fri May 28, 2021 6:58 am

Zlaxer wrote:
Fri May 28, 2021 4:43 am
C-Mag wrote:
Thu May 27, 2021 10:11 pm
Future ATF Commissar wants to ban Assault Weapons, but can't define what an Assault Weapon is.
https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1 ... 3Dmsn_feed

Let’s see him do it - then let’s watch red states pass nullification laws - then let’s watch Marshall’s try to enforce….

Popcorn anyone?
Nullification is a great thing.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by doc_loliday » Fri May 28, 2021 11:45 am

C-Mag wrote:
Thu May 27, 2021 10:11 pm
Future ATF Commissar wants to ban Assault Weapons, but can't define what an Assault Weapon is.
https://twitter.com/dcexaminer/status/1 ... 3Dmsn_feed
Are you in favor of banning assault weapons?

Yes.

What's an assault weapon?

That's up the congress.

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by doc_loliday » Fri May 28, 2021 11:46 am

Here's the real definition of assault weapons.

Any guns conservatives or white people want.

User avatar
The Conservative
Posts: 14790
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by The Conservative » Fri May 28, 2021 1:01 pm

doc_loliday wrote:
Fri May 28, 2021 11:46 am
Here's the real definition of assault weapons.

Any guns conservatives or white people want.
The leftist definition you mean.
#NotOneRedCent

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by C-Mag » Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:25 pm

Federal Judge Rules California's Ban on Assault Rifles Is Unconstitutional

Governor Gavin Newsom, slammed a federal judge’s decision to overturn his state’s three-decade-old ban on assault rifles as
“a direct threat to public safety and the lives of innocent Californians.......................... Comparing an AR-15 to a Swiss army knife is a disgusting slap in the face to those who have lost loved ones to gun violence”
“This case is not about extraordinary weapons lying at the outer limits of Second Amendment protection. The banned ‘assault weapons’ are not bazookas, howitzers, or machine guns. Those arms are dangerous and solely useful for military purposes,” [Benitez's] ruling said. “Instead, the firearms deemed ‘assault weapons’ are fairly ordinary, popular, modern.”

The judge said despite California’s ban, there currently are an estimated 185,569 assault weapons registered with the state.

They were grandfathered in before California’s evolving definition of an assault weapon.

“This is an average case about average guns used in average ways for average purposes,” the ruling said. “One is to be forgiven if one is persuaded by news media and others that the nation is awash with murderous AR-15 assault rifles. The facts, however, do not support this hyperbole, and facts matter.”

“In California, murder by knife occurs seven times more often than murder by rifle,” he added.

He also called the ban “a continuing failed experiment which does not achieve its objectives of preventing mass shootings or attacks on law enforcement officers.”
Full 94 page ruling https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachm ... 210604.pdf

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/rebeccado ... l-n2590532
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... army-knife
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
doc_loliday
Posts: 2443
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:10 am

Re: 2nd Amendment Thread

Post by doc_loliday » Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:32 pm

This is great news, but it's going to be appealed, so no joy for, at the very least, a couple years. Following CA gun politics is long, frustrating and in general disappointing.

What's even sadder is the state of media and politicians losing their mind over the swiss army comparison. Of course they're lying when they say Judge Benetiz' analogy actually means a gun is a swiss army knife, pretending that he wasnt referring to its multiple utilities. But even if they were sincere, it's all moot since knives kill far more people than guns and ar15s are a fraction of those deaths,

In any case may the Lord bless St. Benitez.
Last edited by doc_loliday on Sun Jun 06, 2021 2:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.