F35 vs. A10?
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: F35 vs. A10?
... in the event that America is attacked by a large force of fighter jets immune to ground fire, or bombers that can only be seen by F35 radar.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: F35 vs. A10?
why not hit them before they get near america instead? seems a much better way to defend americans than your approach of waiting until ground fire takes them out or hoping shittier detection methods will still allow them to be taken out before they do damageSuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:19 pm... in the event that America is attacked by a large force of fighter jets immune to ground fire, or bombers that can only be seen by F35 radar.
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:36 pm, edited 4 times in total.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
you can see how air combat works these days by observing India v Pakistan
there are no dogfights, they just fly at each other, launch their missiles, then turn away
the problem then becomes the missiles run out of energy and fall short
the stealth of F-35 means it can keep coming, launch its missiles closer, with more energy
thus making it shooting fish in a barrel for the F-35
there are no dogfights, they just fly at each other, launch their missiles, then turn away
the problem then becomes the missiles run out of energy and fall short
the stealth of F-35 means it can keep coming, launch its missiles closer, with more energy
thus making it shooting fish in a barrel for the F-35
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: F35 vs. A10?
i really want the F-35 to be successful for japan's sake, i am a giant weeb for the nips. china is asshole
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
China has no chance against Japan, China is bluffing across the boardpineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:34 pmi really want the F-35 to be successful for japan's sake, i am a giant weeb for the nips. china is asshole
remember that they follow the doctrine of Sun Tzu ; when you are weak act like you are strong
China can't actually impose its will by military force on Japan, they can't even do it to Taiwan
the Chinese are relying on psyops, which is certainly working on the media
not to mention it is in the vested interests of the MICC to vastly overrate the adversary
this is what they did with the Soviets, Bomber Gap, Missile Gap, Domino Theory, etcetera
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
China has one powerful super weapon to deploy
$3.84 trillion US dollars
the threat of China is not military, the threat is that they bribe the elites to sell everybody down the river
$3.84 trillion US dollars
the threat of China is not military, the threat is that they bribe the elites to sell everybody down the river
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
the military threat is really the Russians
not because they are strong, because they are weak
the weaker Russia gets in relation to NATO, the more likely they will go to war in desperation
not because they are strong, because they are weak
the weaker Russia gets in relation to NATO, the more likely they will go to war in desperation
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 25278
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: F35 vs. A10?
I suspect that the US Navy has better deployment range than the F35, carriers notwithstanding. Then there are the hundreds of military bases with SAM batteries scattered throughout Europe, the Pacific, Japan... Pretty tough to imagine the magical air threat that could get anywhere near us, but ok.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:31 pmwhy not hit them before they get near america instead? seems a much better way to defend americans than your approach of waiting until ground fire takes them out or hoping shittier detection methods will still allow them to be taken out before they do damageSuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:19 pm... in the event that America is attacked by a large force of fighter jets immune to ground fire, or bombers that can only be seen by F35 radar.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: F35 vs. A10?
planes move faster than ships, hence why the navy also deploys F-35's to protect themSuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:48 pmI suspect that the US Navy has better deployment range than the F35, carriers notwithstanding. Then there are the hundreds of military bases with SAM batteries scattered throughout Europe, the Pacific, Japan... Pretty tough to imagine the magical air threat that could get anywhere near us, but ok.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:31 pmwhy not hit them before they get near america instead? seems a much better way to defend americans than your approach of waiting until ground fire takes them out or hoping shittier detection methods will still allow them to be taken out before they do damageSuburbanFarmer wrote: ↑Thu Apr 22, 2021 8:19 pm... in the event that America is attacked by a large force of fighter jets immune to ground fire, or bombers that can only be seen by F35 radar.
just because you don't think F-35 is needed doesn't mean it isn't needed
fact is, you simply don't have a clue what you are talking about, but are so emotionally invested in thinking you are right about this issue, that no amount of facts will change your mind
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: F35 vs. A10?
all these fallacies simply muddy the waters to no good purpose
the media narrative is not even meant to bring the F-35 down, they don't care about that
F-35 Derangement Syndrome is the same media clickbait which the media propagates everywhere
none of it is meant to help, it's just about the media trying to make money as they collapse across the board
but if you understand Trump Derangement Syndrome, then you understand F-35 Derangement Syndrome too
the media narrative is not even meant to bring the F-35 down, they don't care about that
F-35 Derangement Syndrome is the same media clickbait which the media propagates everywhere
none of it is meant to help, it's just about the media trying to make money as they collapse across the board
but if you understand Trump Derangement Syndrome, then you understand F-35 Derangement Syndrome too
Nec Aspera Terrent