The Era of Biden

[SuburbanFarmer]

Don't worry, I have a friend in the military right now... he's over in "sandbox" right now, Iraq and Afganistan aren't where the US troops are being placed right now... this is a distraction tactic. We are going to see things blow up in the near future over there, and it's not going to be where you are thinking.

Things seem to be blowing up all over, in our endless ‘police actions’.

[The Conservative]

Don't worry, I have a friend in the military right now... he's over in "sandbox" right now, Iraq and Afganistan aren't where the US troops are being placed right now... this is a distraction tactic. We are going to see things blow up in the near future over there, and it's not going to be where you are thinking.

Things seem to be blowing up all over, in our endless ‘police actions’.

Well, that is what happens when the UN and EU refuse to step up.

[C-Mag]

The Biden Admin has said it will not keep the truce deal with the Taliban for a May 1st pull out. The Taliban has responded.

Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid delivered a warning via Twitter on Wednesday. “If the agreement is breached and foreign forces fail to exit our country on the specified date, problems will certainly be compounded and those whom failed to comply with the agreement will be held liable,” he said.

Mullah Salih Khan, a Taliban commander in the Helmand Province, told The Daily Beast on Wednesday that the group is prepared to strike “very much prepared to strike” US and Afghan government forces, warning that the Taliban will turn Afghanistan “into a nightmare” for them.

Mullah Mujahid Rahman, a Taliban subcommander from the Ghazni province, also said the group was ready to fight the US. He said the US has “proven they can’t be trusted after retreating from the May 1st deadline” and that the Taliban is willing to “fight till the end” of the US occupation. “We have the pride of defeating about 100,000 invaders from [different] countries in Afghanistan. A few thousand won’t be a problem at all,” he said.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

[clubgop]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

veto won't be necessary, won't get through the Senate.

[Smitty-48]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

as with all progressive virtue signalling, no first use policies are deeply misguided, the road to hell is paved

[Smitty-48]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

veto won't be necessary, won't get through the Senate.

once the Woke have destroyed the US military and brought America to her knees, first use of nukes will be the only thing left in the quiver

[Smitty-48]

just as happened in Canada, leftist progressive virtue signalling has hijacked the US military

the rot is in the bones, but a crippled & impotent America is a recipe for war not peace

the technical term for Canadianization of the military is called Exquisite Irrelevance

a "No First Use Peacekeeping Force" is not a military at all anymore at that threshold

[SuburbanFarmer]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

as with all progressive virtue signalling, no first use policies are deeply misguided, the road to hell is paved

Going to need you to explain this one.

We already have a military capacity greater than the next 3 nations combined. In what scenario could we possibly need a first use of nukes?

[Smitty-48]

Well here’s a bit of positive news. Be a hell of a thing to veto..

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/new ... ear-policy

as with all progressive virtue signalling, no first use policies are deeply misguided, the road to hell is paved

Going to need you to explain this one.

We already have a military capacity greater than the next 3 nations combined. In what scenario could we possibly need a first use of nukes?

a negative assurance with regards to nuclear weapons is simply not credible, it's purely rhetorical

all you do is increase the chances of the adversary doubting your resolve in a crisis

NFU is nothing more than progressive virtue signalling which only increases the chances of a nuclear war

opacity makes the adversary cautious, declarative NFU simply muddies those waters

which is the very fog of war which you need to avoid

NFU is a preformative sop to the leftist disarmament mob which only serves to enable escalation

all roads to nuclear war are paved with this sort of leftist utopian myth of human progress dogma

muddy waters in a nuclear standoff, die in a fire of your own making, Millennials