THE ERA OF TRUMP

[Martin Hash]

Probably time to drop him then and hope for a leader that can beat a decrepit old fool with no policies other than Orange Man Bad.
It's that or split the Republican vote and hand victory to the Dem's on a plate, don't you think?

I'm not a Republican. Trump was all I'd cross over to. You don't seem to understand that nobody cares what you think?

Meh, it's a tough crowd.
I like the challenge, it makes me work harder.

Get your licks in, you won't last much longer.

[DBTrek]

Meh, it's a tough crowd.
I like the challenge, it makes me work harder.

Careful ... I hear hard work is a product of white supremacy.
Don't want any unmarked vans collecting you.

[Smitty-48]

Metaphoric. I'll get #metood. My licenses will be taken. My money will be taken. My ISP will not allow this forum. It's coming.

well it's like you refuse to take your White Fragility Anti-Racism brainwashing ? You can't work

you refuse to get vaccinated for Coronavirus ? You can't travel

you refuse to wear a mask ? You can't go into stores

they don't drag you away, they just close off access

Agree. So what do you think I'm going to do?

I don't tend to think about what other people are going to do at all, I just do my own thing

so I don't have an answer off the top of my head

[Xenophon]

If elections are rigged, doesn't really matter, does it?
No candidate can beat the fix.

Any evidence admissible in a court to prove that theory?
If so you should have let Rudy know before he had 60 cases thrown out of court including courts with Trump appointed judges.

https://hereistheevidence.com/

https://hereistheevidence.com/election- ... e-records/

1. 161,774 mail-in ballot records were changed between Nov 10th version and the Dec 16th Version. Of the changes, 116,840 ballots were given new return dates.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that any ballots without a postmark should “be presumed to have been mailed by Election Day” unless there was strong evidence to the contrary.

The evidence from official records show that 116,840 mail-in ballots have had changed “Return Date” entries between November 10th and December 16th.

2. 69,004 ballots were marked “Returned” after November 3rd.

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar reported on November 10th that only 10,000 ballots were received after November 3rd. She declared that same number to the Supreme Court on November 30th.

3. 19,660 ballots were marked “Returned” after November 6th.

Pennsylvania Supreme Court usurped established Pennsylvania legislation to allow ballots to be counted if received by November 6th. Ballots received after the 6th were to be rejected.

Pennsylvania rejected 7,411 in the 2020 election, as of November 20th.

4. Counties allowed new ballots to be filled out after the election.

Pennsylvania’s deadline for mail-in applications was October 27th, yet new ballots were being filled out and submitted daily.

Berks county was filling out and submitting new ballots on November 16th.

6. As laid out in the Texas lawsuit, Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot anomalies at 118,426 affected ballots. The anomalies from this December 16th version shows:

161,774 records have alterations
Of these alterations:

• 116,840 were Returned Dates changes
  
  69,004 were marked “Returned” after Nov 3rd
  
  19,660 were marked “Returned” after Nov 6th
  
  13,450 ballots have been deleted since Nov 10th
  
  10,415 Return Date with no Mail Date
  
  5,052 Applications Returned after Ballot Mailed
  
  1,034 Applications Approved after Application Returned

Totaling: 191,725 mail-in ballots were touched by alterations, illegality, or anomalies according to data.PA.gov.

In Pennsylvania’s response to the Texas lawsuit, they did not address the mail-in ballot anomalies.

[Martin Hash]

well it's like you refuse to take your White Fragility Anti-Racism brainwashing ? You can't work

you refuse to get vaccinated for Coronavirus ? You can't travel

you refuse to wear a mask ? You can't go into stores

they don't drag you away, they just close off access

Agree. So what do you think I'm going to do?

I don't tend to think about what other people are going to do at all, I just do my own thing

so I don't have an answer off the top of my head

Yeah, me too.

[Montegriffo]

If elections are rigged, doesn't really matter, does it?
No candidate can beat the fix.

Any evidence admissible in a court to prove that theory?
If so you should have let Rudy know before he had 60 cases thrown out of court including courts with Trump appointed judges.

Was evidence allowed to be collected, and impartial courts given a chance to review?
No?

Well, just have to go with that data science, then.
You DO believe data science, right?
Because the whole "climate change" ecosystem is built on it.

Or ... do you only believe data science sometimes?

Are courts like elections then?
When you don't like the results they're rigged but when you do they're legitimate?

[Smitty-48]

Agree. So what do you think I'm going to do?

I don't tend to think about what other people are going to do at all, I just do my own thing

so I don't have an answer off the top of my head

Yeah, me too.

I was an infantryman

the key to that is making your world small

you don't look too far ahead, you just live in the now

clean sheets, hot showers, warm pussy

[Montegriffo]

Meh, it's a tough crowd.
I like the challenge, it makes me work harder.

Careful ... I hear hard work is a product of white supremacy.
Don't want any unmarked vans collecting you.

Is that code for banned again?

[Martin Hash]

Any evidence admissible in a court to prove that theory?
If so you should have let Rudy know before he had 60 cases thrown out of court including courts with Trump appointed judges.

Was evidence allowed to be collected, and impartial courts given a chance to review?
No?

Well, just have to go with that data science, then.
You DO believe data science, right?
Because the whole "climate change" ecosystem is built on it.

Or ... do you only believe data science sometimes?

Are courts like elections then?
When you don't like the results they're rigged but when you do they're legitimate?

We elect our judges in WA. Look here if you want to know if courts are political.

[DBTrek]

Are courts like elections then?
When you don't like the results they're rigged but when you do they're legitimate?

If you don't understand the role of courts I can't help you.
Maybe you could find a YouTube video to explain them.

However, when evidence is wiped, and ballot boxes locked away from investigators, all we can do is review the data.
And the data says fraud.

Again, do you believe in the power of data science, or no?
Because a lot of your pet causes ONLY have data science propping them up.
Is data science rigged when you disagree, but legitimate when you don't?