Who is the President of the Senate?

They are?!Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:53 am Also, with today being the day the Electors cast their vote, all of the disputed states are also sending alternative electors. The dream scenario is that the President of the Senate chooses those alternate electors.
Who is the President of the Senate?
![]()
Yes, but temper your expectations.SilverEagle wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 9:28 amThey are?!Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:53 am Also, with today being the day the Electors cast their vote, all of the disputed states are also sending alternative electors. The dream scenario is that the President of the Senate chooses those alternate electors.
Who is the President of the Senate?
![]()
It was rejected.Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:40 am Rumors are the Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Trump Campaign. Will post link when I find it.
Found it: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/Dis ... qNo=315283
They now have the right to invalidate those absentee ballots.39 We conclude Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires that
(1) each individual elector make his or her own determination as
to whether the elector is indefinitely confined; (2) an elector's
determination may be based only upon age, physical illness or
infirmity; and (3) an elector is indefinitely confined for his or
her own age, physical illness or infirmity, not those of another
person.
40 Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents'
interpretation of Wisconsin's election laws is erroneous.
Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render
all Wisconsin electors "indefinitely confined," thereby obviating
the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an
absentee ballot.
By the Court.—Rights declared.
Any proof of that?Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:53 am Also, with today being the day the Electors cast their vote, all of the disputed states are also sending alternative electors. The dream scenario is that the President of the Senate chooses those alternate electors.
Who is the President of the Senate?
![]()
I see. Evidently, they gave this opinion then dismissed the lawsuit.The Conservative wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:49 amIt was rejected.Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:40 am Rumors are the Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Trump Campaign. Will post link when I find it.
Found it: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/Dis ... qNo=315283
They now have the right to invalidate those absentee ballots.39 We conclude Wis. Stat. § 6.86(2)(a) requires that
(1) each individual elector make his or her own determination as
to whether the elector is indefinitely confined; (2) an elector's
determination may be based only upon age, physical illness or
infirmity; and (3) an elector is indefinitely confined for his or
her own age, physical illness or infirmity, not those of another
person.
40 Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondents'
interpretation of Wisconsin's election laws is erroneous.
Additionally, we conclude that Emergency Order #12 did not render
all Wisconsin electors "indefinitely confined," thereby obviating
the requirement of a valid photo identification to obtain an
absentee ballot.
By the Court.—Rights declared.
GA GOP and PA GOP sent their own electors to cast their ballots at the state capitols, today.The Conservative wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:49 amAny proof of that?Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:53 am Also, with today being the day the Electors cast their vote, all of the disputed states are also sending alternative electors. The dream scenario is that the President of the Senate chooses those alternate electors.
Who is the President of the Senate?
![]()
The Conservative wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:49 amAny proof of that?Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:53 am Also, with today being the day the Electors cast their vote, all of the disputed states are also sending alternative electors. The dream scenario is that the President of the Senate chooses those alternate electors.
Who is the President of the Senate?
![]()
I'm more wondering with that report that just came out, is there a chance to be heard now?Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:19 amI see. Evidently, they gave this opinion then dismissed the lawsuit.The Conservative wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:49 amIt was rejected.Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 8:40 am Rumors are the Wisconsin Supreme Court sided with the Trump Campaign. Will post link when I find it.
Found it: https://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/Dis ... qNo=315283
They now have the right to invalidate those absentee ballots.
Cool. Thanks WI.
No matter the optimistic scenario, I am now convinced the GOP will snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.The Conservative wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:25 amI'm more wondering with that report that just came out, is there a chance to be heard now?Xenophon wrote: Mon Dec 14, 2020 11:19 amI see. Evidently, they gave this opinion then dismissed the lawsuit.
Cool. Thanks WI.