China China China
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: China China China
I don’t recognize your expertise in this matter.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:16 pm
Re: China China China
I agree, overall I have come to the conclusion that international trade is best when it is only for natural resources, and manufactured goods are all manufactured within each individual country. This would mean that if a company wanted to gain access to a market they would need to invest in a market, and open a factory, creating jobs.
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:14 pm
Re: China China China
Never said I was.
We wanted China since the late 80’s
Plus who wouldn’t want a “Nixon went to China”? Just cleaved them from Russia’s economic piggy bank.
Jack of all trades, and reads a lot of Foreign Policy
Currently reading
Foreign Policy Sept/Oct 2018
World war web
Francis Fukuyama
Against Identity Politics
The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy.
I prefer to read and then apply Martin.
You high fiving MF’er
HarryK
HarryK
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:14 pm
Re: China China China
Plus an associates degree in Political Science. Specializing in public policy and the jurisdiction by state or federal agency.
Bachelor’s Degree in Health Information Management Systems.
20 years as a coder/auditor/educator
2006-2016 VAMC Albany NY
2016-2018 VAMC Sheridan WY
Leaving Maxim. Largest contractor for the US Dept of Veteran’s Affaires.
So yeah, I prefer to listen to expertises, and the make an opinion.
Bachelor’s Degree in Health Information Management Systems.
20 years as a coder/auditor/educator
2006-2016 VAMC Albany NY
2016-2018 VAMC Sheridan WY
Leaving Maxim. Largest contractor for the US Dept of Veteran’s Affaires.
So yeah, I prefer to listen to expertises, and the make an opinion.
You high fiving MF’er
HarryK
HarryK
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: China China China
YesTheOneX wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:09 pmI agree, overall I have come to the conclusion that international trade is best when it is only for natural resources, and manufactured goods are all manufactured within each individual country. This would mean that if a company wanted to gain access to a market they would need to invest in a market, and open a factory, creating jobs.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: China China China
Dude, really? Do you have your dick out? I’m the world’s only-ever simultaneously licensed doctor, lawyer, accountant & engineer. I have doctorates in medicine, law & computer science, and an MBA. I’ve been to 100+ countries, twice in China for months & written 3 travel books. I have a bidaily political podcast (1000 episodes), a philosophy book & 6 books of quotes (10,000+), many of them political. I could go on...HarryK wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:39 pmNever said I was.
We wanted China since the late 80’s
Plus who wouldn’t want a “Nixon went to China”? Just cleaved them from Russia’s economic piggy bank.
Jack of all trades, and reads a lot of Foreign Policy
Currently reading
Foreign Policy Sept/Oct 2018
World war web
Francis Fukuyama
Against Identity Politics
The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy.
I prefer to read and then apply Martin.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 291
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 4:14 pm
Re: China China China
Remember the right of rebuttal. I’m more than willing to talk over the phone or zoom, for better context.Martin Hash wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:55 pmDude, really? Do you have your dick out? I’m the world’s only-ever simultaneously licensed doctor, lawyer, accountant & engineer. I have doctorates in medicine, law & computer science, and an MBA. I’ve been to 100+ countries, twice in China for months & written 3 travel books. I have a bidaily political podcast (1000 episodes), a philosophy book & 6 books of quotes (10,000+), many of them political. I could go on...HarryK wrote: ↑Wed Jul 22, 2020 6:39 pmNever said I was.
We wanted China since the late 80’s
Plus who wouldn’t want a “Nixon went to China”? Just cleaved them from Russia’s economic piggy bank.
Jack of all trades, and reads a lot of Foreign Policy
Currently reading
Foreign Policy Sept/Oct 2018
World war web
Francis Fukuyama
Against Identity Politics
The New Tribalism and the Crisis of Democracy.
I prefer to read and then apply Martin.
A lot of things changed during my absence. And I’m better informed and provide imo a more linear approach to China.
So isn’t it best to go from Nixon to the present? And yes it was bipartisan stupidity that led us to this burden.
I prefer a verbal dialogue versus digital ink and stone
I’ll pm my cell # that’s how serious I am.
Unless ya know....
You high fiving MF’er
HarryK
HarryK
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: China China China
Dude, I didn’t mean to flood you. I read your stuff, no problem. Don’t be condescending and I won’t be.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 18721
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:02 pm
Re: China China China
It’s not like we have to agree. My god, I read Clubby all the time.
Shamedia, Shamdemic, Shamucation, Shamlection, Shamconomy & Shamate Change
-
- Posts: 1291
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:16 pm
Re: China China China
I don't understand what is going on in my thread.