Recession is temporary, death is permanent.
That industry is me btw and without any welfare payments (I've been refused benefits) I'm going to really suffer financially but I still take that over death or permanent organ damage.
Recession is temporary, death is permanent.
Fear makes up the difference, but yes.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:23 amRank pettiness, resentment, and malice?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:02 amI was always deeply suspicious of the argument that there are very many people who would intentionally work to destroy a functioning economy that benefited everyone out of .
Looks like I was wrong.
Really?
That's the motive you apply?
This shit needs to stop now.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 8:46 am
https://www.businesscycle.com/ecri-news ... -loss-ever
Government Dependents: "OMG!!! MAMMON WORSHIPERS TRYNA KILL GRANDMA!!!"
Since suicides are up, it looks like curing death through isolation was never a realistic strategy.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:29 amRecession is temporary, death is permanent.
That industry is me btw and without any welfare payments (I've been refused benefits) I'm going to really suffer financially but I still take that over death or permanent organ damage.
Mine is from the CDC from confirmed cases, not proposed without verification.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:17 amhttps://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 8:45 am44K from 1.3 Million, don't over-inflate numbers...Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 6:53 amLast season's flu deaths were around 61k from almost 50 million infections in the US.
The Coronavirus has, so far, killed nearly 77k from 1.3 million confirmed infections.
You would have to multiply the confirmed cases of COVID19 by nearly 40 to make the flu as deadly as the Coronavirus.
file.png
77,249 deaths from 1,297,646 confirmed cases.
If that's your decision based on your assessment of the situation, cool. What's not cool is you trying to decide for everyone else who isn't so well off that their government is like "Nah, this cat will be fine with no work and no assistance". Those people who won't just "suffer financially", but will potentially lose their homes and go hungry. Your personal decision shouldn't be their only option.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:29 amRecession is temporary, death is permanent.
That industry is me btw and without any welfare payments (I've been refused benefits) I'm going to really suffer financially but I still take that over death or permanent organ damage.
This is what bothers me, the people who seem to be the ones saying "just stay home" are also the ones getting paychecks from the government on a weekly/bi-weekly basis.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:33 amIf that's your decision based on your assessment of the situation, cool. What's not cool is you trying to decide for everyone else who isn't so well off that their government is like "Nah, this cat will be fine with no work and no assistance". Those people who won't just "suffer financially", but will potentially lose their homes and go hungry. Your personal decision shouldn't be their only option.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:29 amRecession is temporary, death is permanent.
That industry is me btw and without any welfare payments (I've been refused benefits) I'm going to really suffer financially but I still take that over death or permanent organ damage.
...and when any discussion about the conditions needed before the economy can be reopened safely is ignored or met with accusations of wanting to deliberately damage the economy you have to look at the motivation of those who would put money over lives.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:28 amSure looks that way when any attempt to discuss reopening the economy is met with vitriol and accusations of wanting everyone to die.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:23 amRank pettiness, resentment, and malice?Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:02 amI was always deeply suspicious of the argument that there are very many people who would intentionally work to destroy a functioning economy that benefited everyone out of .
Looks like I was wrong.
Really?
That's the motive you apply?
That's not how reasonable, well-intentioned, honest people respond to discussions.
So . . . we must look for the most likely motives that drive such responses, Occam's Razor style.
I'm not getting a fucking cent.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:37 amThis is what bothers me, the people who seem to be the ones saying "just stay home" are also the ones getting paychecks from the government on a weekly/bi-weekly basis.DBTrek wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:33 amIf that's your decision based on your assessment of the situation, cool. What's not cool is you trying to decide for everyone else who isn't so well off that their government is like "Nah, this cat will be fine with no work and no assistance". Those people who won't just "suffer financially", but will potentially lose their homes and go hungry. Your personal decision shouldn't be their only option.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri May 08, 2020 9:29 amRecession is temporary, death is permanent.
That industry is me btw and without any welfare payments (I've been refused benefits) I'm going to really suffer financially but I still take that over death or permanent organ damage.