No link... all you talking... yack yack yack...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:50 pmThis past week has seen the epidemic picking up speed, by the way. Well over 2k deaths per day. We will have crossed 80k dead by the weekend, and it was only about a week ago that crossing 60k seemed like a big deal.
Coronavirus thread
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:52 pmNo link... all you talking... yack yack yack...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:50 pmThis past week has seen the epidemic picking up speed, by the way. Well over 2k deaths per day. We will have crossed 80k dead by the weekend, and it was only about a week ago that crossing 60k seemed like a big deal.
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
You are obviously not, Karen. And yes on the repeat. Show me the blanket quarantine of the healthy? Also this isn't true quarantine, I have worked and seen real quarantine, lockdowns or stay at homes ain't it. Quarantine means confinement to quarters and you stay there. People bring you everything, you never leave, no parks, no hiking, no fucking tinder, no fucking period. Is that what your hypocritical ass is suggesting? No, no it isn't. It's lockdown and stay at home, like you on a tinder date, with limp wristed enforcement and exceptions, like your tinder thots, with holes so big you could drive a truck through.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:44 pmI am obviously just joking about putting you in a FEMA camp, but I forgot I am dealing with craziness here. No, it is not unconstitutional to impose quarantines on you. We've had them before. We just had this debate with DB before he imploded and stormed off. Should we repeat that?clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:38 pmYour bitch ass wouldn't even leave the house. This isn't Tinder, I swipe left on your unconstitutional fascist power grabs. Notice who agrees with you. The usual suspects who don't respect the Constitution 24/7, 365. Gone gangster with the gun grabbers, gratulations.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:32 pm
Oh hell yes I would put you in a FEMA camp. At this point, fuck it. Clown world.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Oh we are doing this again. Okay.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:58 pmYou are obviously not, Karen. And yes on the repeat. Show me the blanket quarantine of the healthy? Also this isn't true quarantine, I have worked and seen real quarantine, lockdowns or stay at homes ain't it. Quarantine means confinement to quarters and you stay there. People bring you everything, you never leave, no parks, no hiking, no fucking tinder, no fucking period. Is that what your hypocritical ass is suggesting? No, no it isn't. It's lockdown and stay at home, like you on a tinder date, with limp wristed enforcement and exceptions, like your tinder thots, with holes so big you could drive a truck through.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:44 pmI am obviously just joking about putting you in a FEMA camp, but I forgot I am dealing with craziness here. No, it is not unconstitutional to impose quarantines on you. We've had them before. We just had this debate with DB before he imploded and stormed off. Should we repeat that?clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:38 pm
Your bitch ass wouldn't even leave the house. This isn't Tinder, I swipe left on your unconstitutional fascist power grabs. Notice who agrees with you. The usual suspects who don't respect the Constitution 24/7, 365. Gone gangster with the gun grabbers, gratulations.
Are you disputing that the government has the authority to impose quarantines and social isolation measures, or are you now trying to create a vague straw man about how these are not real social isolation measures?
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Both. They do the latter because even they know they can't get away with the former.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 5:00 pmOh we are doing this again. Okay.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:58 pmYou are obviously not, Karen. And yes on the repeat. Show me the blanket quarantine of the healthy? Also this isn't true quarantine, I have worked and seen real quarantine, lockdowns or stay at homes ain't it. Quarantine means confinement to quarters and you stay there. People bring you everything, you never leave, no parks, no hiking, no fucking tinder, no fucking period. Is that what your hypocritical ass is suggesting? No, no it isn't. It's lockdown and stay at home, like you on a tinder date, with limp wristed enforcement and exceptions, like your tinder thots, with holes so big you could drive a truck through.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:44 pm
I am obviously just joking about putting you in a FEMA camp, but I forgot I am dealing with craziness here. No, it is not unconstitutional to impose quarantines on you. We've had them before. We just had this debate with DB before he imploded and stormed off. Should we repeat that?
Are you disputing that the government has the authority to impose quarantines and social isolation measures, or are you now trying to create a vague straw man about how these are not real social isolation measures?
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
Wow, you use some third party site that has no verification of proof of data... yet I do...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:53 pmhttps://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:52 pmNo link... all you talking... yack yack yack...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:50 pmThis past week has seen the epidemic picking up speed, by the way. Well over 2k deaths per day. We will have crossed 80k dead by the weekend, and it was only about a week ago that crossing 60k seemed like a big deal.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-C ... /9bhg-hcku
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Strange that we implemented these exact same measures in 1918 and nobody noticed until now, no? Or that the guys who wrote the Constitution themselves imposed quarantines for yellow fever and small pox?clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 5:02 pmBoth. They do the latter because even they know they can't get away with the former.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 5:00 pmOh we are doing this again. Okay.clubgop wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 4:58 pm
You are obviously not, Karen. And yes on the repeat. Show me the blanket quarantine of the healthy? Also this isn't true quarantine, I have worked and seen real quarantine, lockdowns or stay at homes ain't it. Quarantine means confinement to quarters and you stay there. People bring you everything, you never leave, no parks, no hiking, no fucking tinder, no fucking period. Is that what your hypocritical ass is suggesting? No, no it isn't. It's lockdown and stay at home, like you on a tinder date, with limp wristed enforcement and exceptions, like your tinder thots, with holes so big you could drive a truck through.
Are you disputing that the government has the authority to impose quarantines and social isolation measures, or are you now trying to create a vague straw man about how these are not real social isolation measures?
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Coronavirus thread
Here is a great visualization of modeling data:
https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-s ... ca/georgia
Look at the projected deaths per day chart for Georgia in the aftermath of the governor's order. If these modelers are correct, what exactly do you think is going to happen to the republican party there?
I think republicans are taking an enormous gamble right now. If the models are wrong, then good on the republicans. But holy fucking shit if the scientists were right.. end times for the GOP.
https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-s ... ca/georgia
Look at the projected deaths per day chart for Georgia in the aftermath of the governor's order. If these modelers are correct, what exactly do you think is going to happen to the republican party there?
I think republicans are taking an enormous gamble right now. If the models are wrong, then good on the republicans. But holy fucking shit if the scientists were right.. end times for the GOP.
-
- Posts: 14775
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
You mean this? Stop making this too easy...Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Thu May 07, 2020 5:35 pmHere is a great visualization of modeling data:
https://covid19.healthdata.org/united-s ... ca/georgia
Look at the projected deaths per day chart for Georgia in the aftermath of the governor's order. If these modelers are correct, what exactly do you think is going to happen to the republican party there?
I think republicans are taking an enormous gamble right now. If the models are wrong, then good on the republicans. But holy fucking shit if the scientists were right.. end times for the GOP.
https://data.cdc.gov/NCHS/Provisional-C ... /9bhg-hcku
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Coronavirus thread
No one else is pointing this out other than STA, but it's worth noting.
STA posts a story about PPE being imported to the US from outside the US.
TC calls him dumb, then uses an example of the US stopping the export of PPE as his proof.
TC claims to be an IT guy but can't get his inputs and outputs figured out.
STA posts a story about PPE being imported to the US from outside the US.
TC calls him dumb, then uses an example of the US stopping the export of PPE as his proof.
TC claims to be an IT guy but can't get his inputs and outputs figured out.