SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:29 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:27 am
The most likely worst case scenario is that I get friendzoned because the guy she's "involved with" is actually the real deal boyfriend, and she's one of the very few chicks who ever had real deal boyfriend and only wanted to say that much about him when asked about it directly
She's either hot for you or she's not,

the note just forces a resolution one way or the other

If she calls, you know she's hot for you

If not, you've already moved on
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by StCapps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:31 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:29 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:27 am
The most likely worst case scenario is that I get friendzoned because the guy she's "involved with" is actually the real deal boyfriend, and she's one of the very few chicks who ever had real deal boyfriend and only wanted to say that much about him when asked about it directly
She's either hot for you or she's not,

the note just forces a resolution one way or the other

If she calls, you know she's hot for you

If not, you've already moved on
Indeed, no need to overthink it just because it's the workplace, it's really not as perilous as the "SJWs reeeeee!" crowd make it out to be, especially when we don't even work for the same employer
*yip*

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25241
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:34 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 6:48 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 4:06 am
Maybe get approval from your HR dept first.
Don't want to get known as the creepy guy who keeps asking staff whether they are single and passes unsolicited notes to them. ;)
Jobs are jails, go ahead and fire me, suckahs
Shit, I’d actually make more on enemployment right now. I wish they would.
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:35 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:31 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:29 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:27 am
The most likely worst case scenario is that I get friendzoned because the guy she's "involved with" is actually the real deal boyfriend, and she's one of the very few chicks who ever had real deal boyfriend and only wanted to say that much about him when asked about it directly
She's either hot for you or she's not,

the note just forces a resolution one way or the other

If she calls, you know she's hot for you

If not, you've already moved on
Indeed, no need to overthink it just because it's the workplace, it's really not as perilous as the "SJWs reeeeee!" crowd make it out to be, especially when we don't even work for the same employer
I wrote the note to cover for that

The note says no funny business, no strings attached,

and all you said was you think she is "very sweet"

No harm, no foul
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by StCapps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:37 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:35 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:31 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:29 am


She's either hot for you or she's not,

the note just forces a resolution one way or the other

If she calls, you know she's hot for you

If not, you've already moved on
Indeed, no need to overthink it just because it's the workplace, it's really not as perilous as the "SJWs reeeeee!" crowd make it out to be, especially when we don't even work for the same employer
I wrote the note to cover for that


The note says no funny business, no strings attached,

and all you said was you think she is "very sweet"


No harm, no foul
Indeed, this shit is fucking fool proof

It's diabolical, whether she has a real deal boyfriend or not, her panties will soaked regardless, even if the real deal boyfriend is the beneficiary
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:39 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:37 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:35 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:31 am
Indeed, no need to overthink it just because it's the workplace, it's really not as perilous as the "SJWs reeeeee!" crowd make it out to be, especially when we don't even work for the same employer
I wrote the note to cover for that


The note says no funny business, no strings attached,

and all you said was you think she is "very sweet"


No harm, no foul
Indeed, this shit is fucking fool proof

It's diabolical, whether she has a real deal boyfriend or not, her panties will soaked regardless, even if the real deal boyfriend is the beneficiary
When you're already bedding her, then you can say "hot" & "cute" & "I wanna fuck you"

But for the pick up, always use "sweet"
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by StCapps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:42 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:39 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:37 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:35 am


I wrote the note to cover for that


The note says no funny business, no strings attached,

and all you said was you think she is "very sweet"


No harm, no foul
Indeed, this shit is fucking fool proof

It's diabolical, whether she has a real deal boyfriend or not, her panties will soaked regardless, even if the real deal boyfriend is the beneficiary
When you're already bedding her, then you can say "hot" & "cute" & "I wanna fuck you"

But for the pick up, always use "sweet"
She's all three, but sweet is the sweetest option and also the least creepy, because it's about her personality and not her appearance, which also makes her feel more special and less like you could be using that line on any girl you happen to find attractive
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:46 am, edited 2 times in total.
*yip*

Smitty-48
Posts: 36399
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by Smitty-48 » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:46 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:42 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:39 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:37 am
Indeed, this shit is fucking fool proof

It's diabolical, whether she has a real deal boyfriend or not, her panties will soaked regardless, even if the real deal boyfriend is the beneficiary
When you're already bedding her, then you can say "hot" & "cute" & "I wanna fuck you"

But for the pick up, always use "sweet"
She's all three, but sweet is the sweetest option and also the least creepy, because it's about her personality and not her appearance, which also makes her feel more special and less like you could be using that line on any girl you happen to find attractive
Very Very Sweet is maximum romantic

The pickup is all about romance, fucking comes later
Nec Aspera Terrent

User avatar
StCapps
Posts: 16879
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
Location: Hamilton, Ontario

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by StCapps » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:47 am

Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:46 am
StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:42 am
Smitty-48 wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:39 am

When you're already bedding her, then you can say "hot" & "cute" & "I wanna fuck you"

But for the pick up, always use "sweet"
She's all three, but sweet is the sweetest option and also the least creepy, because it's about her personality and not her appearance, which also makes her feel more special and less like you could be using that line on any girl you happen to find attractive
Very Very Sweet is maximum romantic

The pickup is all about romance, fucking comes later
When it comes to the pick up, sweet is the better way to go, especially with a girl like this, who is genuinely very very sweet and innocent, so it's extremely accurate and I 100% believe it

It's seeing her the way she wants to be seen, she's going to eat it up, one way or the other

If she takes it the wrong way, I'd be legit shocked
*yip*

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18716
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo

Post by Montegriffo » Thu Apr 23, 2020 7:51 am

StCapps wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 5:37 am
Montegriffo wrote:
Thu Apr 23, 2020 4:06 am
Maybe get approval from your HR dept first.
Don't want to get known as the creepy guy who keeps asking staff whether they are single and passes unsolicited notes to them. ;)
Coming from the dude who hits on women at work far more than I ever have
:lol:

Monte actually told a funny joke for once, that's growth son, keep it up Monte
You're assuming that I hit on waitresses rather than they threw themselves at me. Everyone wanted a piece of 20 something Monte. 8-)
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image