Most likely--but Vienna would remain the high water mark of Islam forever--though they tried again in 1683--Christendom wouldn't stand for it. Um, when I wrote "forever," what I meant was until they just started walking in instead of more literally trying to undermine European foundations.Speaker to Animals wrote:Might have triggered another holy war. We used to be an awesome civilization back then.
But if Charles V didn't get off his ass quite so quickly, and winter arrived a little later, it's remotely possible that Suleyman may have taken the city (which Napoleon later termed "The Gateway to Asia"); in which case, he'd still have to hold it--not a comfortable proposition for the Ottomans logistically. Who knows? If they had taken Vienna, perhaps a more united Europe would take it back, and then some! Constantinople itself may have fallen into the hands of the Holy Roman Empire.
It's worth a thought.
One of the only "suggestions" I ever made to Dan was that he cover Vienna 1683--much more fun--but other than mention it in a podcast once--crickets.
But seriously, y'all suck!