Martin Hash wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:33 am
It’s often people who would welcome Marxism, both because they would benefit from it and the people they are envious of would be penalized, and have seen their perverse anticipation squelched by OWGs, who are most susceptible to TDS.
Oh wow, the right's version of ''everyone who doesn't agree with me is a racist.''
That made an early entrance to the thread.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Seriously, when the NHS ultimately defines TDS as a psych condition, Monte needs to go. Millions of people do.
TDS is caused by MSM indoctrination to susceptible minds. Monte’s a smart cookie, he’s just so envious & insecure that it makes him a candidate for the brainwashing.
C-Mag wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:23 am
Well, if you said you didn't like Obama, you're racist.
Was that acceptable?
Was it a valid argument?
Do two wrongs make a right?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Monte is too invested in hating Trump now to ever give it up
If he figures out that he got so invested in a total delusion, it would destroy the view of himself as not being a partisan hack
The blinders ain't getting turned off, fallacy of sunk costs will never allow him to admit to himself that he grasps at straws to attack Trump because he doesn't like him and can't see straight
Cognitive dissonance is a helluva drug
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Martin Hash wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:40 am
Seriously, when the NHS ultimately defines TDS as a psych condition, Monte needs to go. Millions of people do.
TDS is caused by MSM indoctrination to susceptible minds. Monte’s a smart cookie, he’s just so envious & insecure that it makes him a candidate for the brainwashing.
Oh ok, just outright personal attack now.
Tiny bit of perspective over media content but not much else.
Envious and insecure? I don't think so.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Montegriffo wrote: Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:45 amEnvious and insecure? I don't think so.
It's plain as day to the rest of us, you just don't want to see yourself that way, and since you are that way, you need blinders up to prevent you from seeing it, which is called cognitive dissonance and is fueled by your confirmation bias that is inherently Anti-Trump
Oh ok, just outright personal attack now.
Tiny bit of perspective over media content but not much else.
Envious and insecure? I don't think so.
It's the obsessive nature of it
You talk about Trump more than I talk about my wife
Trump is your muse, dude.
It's weird
Indeed, and not only does he talk about it all the time, he focuses on the dumbest lines of attack, showing that well over 90% of the time that he can't tell the difference between a shitty attack on Trump and a good attack Trump, because the media he trusts tells him it's all A+ material, and he believes them because they are telling him what he wants to hear, which is Orange Man Bad
Last edited by StCapps on Thu Apr 16, 2020 8:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
