W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by C-Mag » Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:05 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:48 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:43 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:41 pm

Well, the first two make his subsequent inaction unfathomable and I've not accused him of the 3rd.
I think fear over the negative consequences to his reelection chances as a result of damage to the economy is another possible reason.
Fauci confirmed yesterday that Trump listened to the Experts and did what the Experts told him to do, the first time they told him.
LOL.
After Trump retweeted calls for his sacking.
Not hard to imagine that pressure was put on him to big up Trump or else.
Dr. Obvious was asked that question. He said he was not pressured at all.

Or, maybe Fauci is just a liar.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
C-Mag
Posts: 28305
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by C-Mag » Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:11 pm

BTW
If you were following the COVID threat early, you knew that Sen Tom Cotton called for the travel restrictions after a classified briefing to Congress.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... rus-spread

And if you were following it, you know only 6 members of Congress attended that briefing, while the remainder with fucking around with a bull shit impeachment trial.
PLATA O PLOMO


Image


Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience

User avatar
Montegriffo
Posts: 18718
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by Montegriffo » Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:17 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:05 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:48 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:43 pm


Fauci confirmed yesterday that Trump listened to the Experts and did what the Experts told him to do, the first time they told him.
LOL.
After Trump retweeted calls for his sacking.
Not hard to imagine that pressure was put on him to big up Trump or else.
Dr. Obvious was asked that question. He said he was not pressured at all.

Or, maybe Fauci is just a liar.
Again, it's perfectly possible that pressure was put on him to deny that pressure was put on him.
The whole point of putting pressure on him would have been to make him say things to favour Trump after all.
Retweeting calls for his sacking was a form of pressure in itself. A move not adequately explained by Trump from what I saw.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
Image

User avatar
SuburbanFarmer
Posts: 25287
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
Location: Ohio

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by SuburbanFarmer » Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:22 pm

DBTrek wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 2:50 pm
What will they do when Trump is no longer president tho?
I guess whatever the Hobbits did once the One Ring was destroyed.

Sit around being hairy and fat, shove their faces full of food in between naps.
/shrug
I mean... that does sound pretty good :lol:
SJWs are a natural consequence of corporatism.

Formerly GrumpyCatFace

https://youtu.be/CYbT8-rSqo0

User avatar
Hanarchy Montanarchy
Posts: 5991
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:54 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by Hanarchy Montanarchy » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:16 pm

Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:34 pm
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:26 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:18 pm


Out of interest, how do you explain Trump continuing to downplay it long after most people recognised the seriousness of the bug?
I don't hold Trump exclusively responsible for mishandling this outbreak. Boris made mistakes early on with his herd immunity theories but at least he recognised his mistake fairly quickly and has since done everything in his power to mitigate it. To me, Trump appears to have just done his usual deriding of experts and scapegoating others in order to deflect from his own shortcomings.
Well, I can't totally explain it, but if I were responsible for the stability of the global economy, I would probably have been very cautious about over reacting. I can't say I would have done any different when balancing the two disasters, public health and economic, against each other.

I do wish he would stop firing broadsides against everyone in order to deflect responsibility, and just be open about his decision making processes, where the info was bad, and mistakes were made. But, the fact that he is petty, narcissistic, and short sighted doesn't mean he was wrong to be cautious about shutting down the economy, or responsible for any of the deaths.
It's the prioritising of the economy over any public health concerns that I find the most troubling.
My suspicious mind is led to believe that reelection in November is his primary motivation.
It may be that Trump's motivation was saving his own hide. In fact, knowing anything about Trump, it probably was. That doesn't make it the wrong decision.

Hind sight is 20/20, but in the moment, I don't think prioritizing the economy was wrong. In fact, I still think the economic fallout might be so bad that it will make trying to save 500,000 people, many of whom are already chronically ill, will seem silly. Its possible, and not knowing anything about a novel virus, by definition, prioritizing the economy for any reason is a sensible thing to do.
HAIL!

Her needs America so they won't just take his shit away like in some pussy non gun totting countries can happen.
-Hwen

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:34 pm

Someone starts a thread to criticize the WHO and all of sudden a bunch of roaches come out of hiding to defend them. :lol:

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:36 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 6:11 pm
BTW
If you were following the COVID threat early, you knew that Sen Tom Cotton called for the travel restrictions after a classified briefing to Congress.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poli ... rus-spread

And if you were following it, you know only 6 members of Congress attended that briefing, while the remainder with fucking around with a bull shit impeachment trial.
bu..bu...but Trump was GOLFING!!!!

PartyOf5
Posts: 3657
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by PartyOf5 » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:39 pm

C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:30 pm
Granted the relatively low death rate in the USA may have more to do with the US private healthcare system over European public health systems. But it could have been the early actions of Trump to limit travel when the WHO and political opponents were saying it was racist.
Either way the Euro Trump haters lose. Either Trump acted appropriately and it's resulted in lives saved, or the healthcare system in the US is superior to those in the EU.

heydaralon
Posts: 7571
Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 7:54 pm

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by heydaralon » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:46 pm

Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:16 pm
Montegriffo wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:34 pm
Hanarchy Montanarchy wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:26 pm


Well, I can't totally explain it, but if I were responsible for the stability of the global economy, I would probably have been very cautious about over reacting. I can't say I would have done any different when balancing the two disasters, public health and economic, against each other.

I do wish he would stop firing broadsides against everyone in order to deflect responsibility, and just be open about his decision making processes, where the info was bad, and mistakes were made. But, the fact that he is petty, narcissistic, and short sighted doesn't mean he was wrong to be cautious about shutting down the economy, or responsible for any of the deaths.
It's the prioritising of the economy over any public health concerns that I find the most troubling.
My suspicious mind is led to believe that reelection in November is his primary motivation.
It may be that Trump's motivation was saving his own hide. In fact, knowing anything about Trump, it probably was. That doesn't make it the wrong decision.

Hind sight is 20/20, but in the moment, I don't think prioritizing the economy was wrong. In fact, I still think the economic fallout might be so bad that it will make trying to save 500,000 people, many of whom are already chronically ill, will seem silly. Its possible, and not knowing anything about a novel virus, by definition, prioritizing the economy for any reason is a sensible thing to do.

I hear this bullshit at work too, prioritizing the economy by Bernie types. The economy is very fucking important Monte. The reason that we can keep the insanely expensive healthcare appparatus in place that will pay for all these COVID victims comes from the economy. The Healthcare systems you pay for with your tax dollars require revenue from (you guessed it!) taxpayers. People with jobs who are taxed. For that equation to work, you need money coming in. Grocery stores are part of the economy. People need to be able to work so they can buy things like food to eat while they are quarantined.

You realize that most small businesses are not profitable for the first few years right? Some folks spend decades of their lives saving scrimping and clawing to get one off the ground. Their margins are not as fat as you think. You probably think that they can just close for a few months and then open right back up no problem. Bull. Shit. It doesn't work that way, bills, insurance, mortgage, car payments, and children are fucking expensive and they don't stop because great grandma got the China cold. This is going to fuck up a lot of folks who spent huge portions of their lives putting all they had into their business to say nothing of their workers. The economy is the reason that you have a fucking healthcare system and all those social programs you like and aren't begging for rice with bugs crawling out of your ass.

I don't want anyone to die from this either, but destroying the livelihood of millions of Americans to say nothing of the restricting of their liberties and movements to protect a bunch of 80 year olds is a very fucking selfish way of looking at things imo. The elderly should do what they can to protect themselves, but we are going to be of zero help to them if we can't provide them with financial support.
Last edited by heydaralon on Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Shikata ga nai

Zlaxer
Posts: 5377
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 5:04 am

Re: W.H.O. (are you), WHO WHO

Post by Zlaxer » Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:48 pm

PartyOf5 wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 7:39 pm
C-Mag wrote:
Wed Apr 15, 2020 5:30 pm
Granted the relatively low death rate in the USA may have more to do with the US private healthcare system over European public health systems. But it could have been the early actions of Trump to limit travel when the WHO and political opponents were saying it was racist.
Either way the Euro Trump haters lose. Either Trump acted appropriately and it's resulted in lives saved, or the healthcare system in the US is superior to those in the EU.
Or EU’s superior socialized healthcare creates more old people than US. Not that I agree with this - EU death rate is higher bc they have more old farts.