Yeah and that's all Fake News, yet another Democrat Hoax, DJT KnowsMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:01 amNo one blamed Trump for the virus but many blame him for the piss poor response to it. Denial, inaction, and deflection, you know...TDS because all criticism of Trump is derangement.StCapps wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:51 amHe said the Democrats blaming him for it was the hoax, and it is, you hoax bagSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:06 am
What the fuck is this? Is this a deep fake CGI?
He was totally fucking wrong, and we now know he was ignoring the experts telling him we needed to act drastically. If he was a bit more concerned with coronavirus than his precious markets, we'd not be here today with so many fatalities. He should be held accountable to his own proclamations of success here.
FUCK THE PRC
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: FUCK THE PRC
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: FUCK THE PRC
I remind you once again, the Democrats are not in power. Whatever errors they have made is not the point.StCapps wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:58 amThe Democrats were ones who didn't care in early going, saying Trump was being racist for acting in any way, yet you blame Trump for not acting quick enough when they wanted less action and said Trump was fearmongeringMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 9:56 am...or possibly better off than now if there had been someone in charge who cared more about the lives of Americans than the strength of the markets and his chances of reelection.
Trump Derangement Syndrome is a helluva drug
Trump literally said that he accepted no responsibility. Someone needs to tell him it's his fucking job.
...and if you mention TDS one more fucking time I swear to Gaia I'm going to put you on ignore and never speak to you again. TDS is not an argument it is just a way of ignoring criticism that you refuse to admit has any validity. It is dishonest and insulting to the intelligence of those you accuse of having it. Enough already, if you don't wish to discuss the criticisms raised then just shut the fuck up.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: FUCK THE PRC
Ahhhhhh . . . I see. Democrats have no power in NY.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:11 amI remind you once again, the Democrats are not in power. Whatever errors they have made is not the point.
Well, that certainly settles it.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: FUCK THE PRC
Yes they are, in the House, where they were holding up emergency coronavirus bills to cram their leftist agenda down America's throatsMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:11 amI remind you once again, the Democrats are not in power.
TDS Over 9000
*yip*
-
- Posts: 3360
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 9:36 am
- Location: Aalborg, Denmark
Re: FUCK THE PRC
The federal response that made sure that the US will only see some 20k or so deaths covers what, excatly? Is closing flights to China (or something Trump actually did) the main difference between 20K and 200K death? Something else? Isn't the response to the virus, primarily a state issue? If so, surely it makes as little sense to put all or most of the blame on Trump as it does giving him the responsibility for all or most of the successes?
Fame is not flattery. Respect is not agreement.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: FUCK THE PRC
Must be your distance from America and our media that grants you such clarity on the situation.BjornP wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 10:24 amThe federal response that made sure that the US will only see some 20k or so deaths covers what, excatly? Is closing flights to China (or something Trump actually did) the main difference between 20K and 200K death? Something else? Isn't the response to the virus, primarily a state issue? If so, surely it makes as little sense to put all or most of the blame on Trump as it does giving him the responsibility for all or most of the successes?
You're right, of course .. . . but good luck arguing that here.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: FUCK THE PRC
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 12241
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 7:04 pm
Re: FUCK THE PRC
Monte tries the quick reversal, pretending it wasn't leftists decrying Trump for months over not doing enough, and now calling him a tyrant for threatening further actions.
This is why you can't meme.
This is why you can't meme.
"Hey varmints, don't mess with a guy that's riding a buffalo"
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: FUCK THE PRC
Since it is Trump who has flip-flopped and the further action he is threatening is an unseemly haste to reopen the country, putting lives at risk for the markets, by trying to unconstitutionally force the states to bend to the will of the feds, I reckon it's a good enough meme to make the point.
One day he is accepting no responsibility and the next he is claiming to be the all-powerful man in charge.
/shrugs
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: FUCK THE PRC
So say the Democrats anyway, TDS is a helluva drugMontegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 14, 2020 11:25 amOne day he is accepting no responsibility and the next he is claiming to be the all-powerful man in charge.
/shrugs
Monte is such a rube for obvious Demohack propaganda, and it's turning his mind to mush
*yip*