I think we got each other's dads by mistake. My dad was a strict authoritarian with a family history of military service and was a lifelong Tory.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:14 pmHe didn't like the English, he didn't like the UK, but he would have liked you
He wasn't a Baby Boomer, he was a War Baby
He wasn't a Hippie, he was a Beatnik
He still thought Hippie chicks were hot, but also vacuous
That's why he was so hot for my mom,
She wasn't a Hippie neither, she was like Blond Beehive ealry sixties chick, super hot, but also a Beatnik
SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
#6ixgod
Was legit hard to find that song, had to ask my bro the deets just to find it, apparently he was also looking for it a few days before and had trouble finding it as well, I typed in tre bars not dre barrs, so close, yet so far away according to youtube and google
Praise JaCapps
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
You're wasting your time Speaker, just start another thread so it won't get lost amongst all the jibber-jabber.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 9:21 amSpeaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:53 amAnywho.. to keep ahead of retard spam..
Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:37 amNot sure if I should put this here or in the retarded "Let's blame China" thread..
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2020 ... 2004999117
Genome data points to the United States as the origin for the ancestral A-type of the virus, not Wuhan.
All the dumbass conservatives trying to shift blame on China are about to get their asses handed to them, and all of America along with them for this stupidity.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 8:44 amOne of the authors of the paper is interviewed about this.
More here:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 085644.htm
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Jibber-Jabber is where it's at, fuck zerohedge and the horse it rode in on
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
My father was a pacifist in terms of warMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:23 pm
I think we got each other's dads by mistake. My dad was a strict authoritarian with a family history of military service and was a lifelong Tory.
Not in terms of hockey, he was a violent hockey player, he was an enforcer
But he could not kill another man, he didn't have it in him
He still loved the regiment, he still loved the troops, he used to walk beside the parades
There is a little plaque at Queen's Park in Toronto kind of hidden away on the side
For the Mackenzie-Papineau in the Spanish Civil War
He would divert away from the army parade, so he could touch the Mac-Paps monument on his way
All my army buddies loved him, because he was the life of the party, he pushed them out of their comfort zone
He was an authoritarian father, his word was law, and I was an uppity barracks room lawyer
We were still best friends tho, so even when we brawled, we always made up after
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Nothing wrong with jibber-jabber if it's contained to one thread. Speaker just needs to start another one if he wants to bring some new virus info to the table and hope you don't go all hockey wars on his ass.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 2713
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:41 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Not to be that guy, but the Forsters are associated with the Wilson Center, and the Renfrew chap is a government darling of the PRC for his archaeological work.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:29 pmYou're wasting your time Speaker, just start another thread so it won't get lost amongst all the jibber-jabber.
I'm not saying they're towing the Chinese claim that it was an American serviceman who was patient zero, but...
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
There's no reason to do anything for Fake StAMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:34 pmNothing wrong with jibber-jabber if it's contained to one thread. Speaker just needs to start another one if he wants to bring some new virus info to the table and hope you don't go all hockey wars on his ass.
Fake StA is a sock puppet, by his own admission
Sock puppets get the respect they deserve, which is none /shrugs
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Real Game FTWSmitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:39 pmThere's no reason to do anything for Fake StAMontegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Apr 13, 2020 1:34 pmNothing wrong with jibber-jabber if it's contained to one thread. Speaker just needs to start another one if he wants to bring some new virus info to the table and hope you don't go all hockey wars on his ass.
Fake StA is a sock puppet, by his own admission
Sock puppets get the respect they deserve, which is none /shrugs
*yip*
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario