Climate Denier Hard To Refute

[Fife]

And back to the peer review racket.. Remember that professor the Marxist loons went after at that low-brow teaching college, Evergreen? Turns out that guy is actually smart as fuck, was condemned there because his evolutionary ideas bucked against “consensus”. He tried to get a paper published about it and was rejected by peer review. Then one of the scientists who rejected his paper stole the idea, conducted her own research, and got a Nobel Prize without crediting him for his contribution. Peer review is a gate-keeping system meant to protect a club within academia. It is not really part of science at all, but actually detrimental to science.

That podcast episode was pretty revealing about the purity of the academy, eh?

[Martin Hash]

[Calculus Man]

And back to the peer review racket.. Remember that professor the Marxist loons went after at that low-brow teaching college, Evergreen? Turns out that guy is actually smart as fuck, was condemned there because his evolutionary ideas bucked against “consensus”. He tried to get a paper published about it and was rejected by peer review. Then one of the scientists who rejected his paper stole the idea, conducted her own research, and got a Nobel Prize without crediting him for his contribution. Peer review is a gate-keeping system meant to protect a club within academia. It is not really part of science at all, but actually detrimental to science.

Interesting. What idea was stolen? Can you link to a related story or to the research the Marxist published?

[Martin Hash]

Climate Alarmists have no one who can compete with this guy.

[The Conservative]

Climate Alarmists have no one who can compete with this guy.

As much as I want to agree with him he is playing with words when describing rates of escalation. Yes there is no significant increase, but a gradual increase doesn't mean an alarm shouldn't be risen.

It just means that it's a cold pot warming up slowly theory.

So e regions should do something to protect themselves, but I agree, it's regional. Not world wide.

[Martin Hash]

Dude, his argument is that the ocean has the same level everywhere, not just in alarmist regions. He points out how the data is intentionally misinterpreted.

Heller is a computer scientist; specifically, data analysis and climate simulation.

[The Conservative]

Dude, his argument is that the ocean has the same level everywhere, not just in alarmist regions. He points out how the data is intentionally misinterpreted.

Heller is a computer scientist; specifically, data analysis and climate simulation.

You did see some of the charts were showing an increase even though it was a gradual or not so gradual increase over a century+?

And I'm glad he is what he is, but when you see this:

D23A24B5-1F50-45D6-AADB-68927DEFC4EA.jpeg

I don't care what you think, but statistical data shows a gradual increase over decades.

This means either the land is settling (which it probably is) causing what looks like the sea level rising. Or the sea level is rising. (which its not)

Either way, you have to admit there was wordplay used. Yea, there is no drastic increase, but an increase of over 200% is not a small amount.

[Martin Hash]

Yes, oil pumping in the Gulf, plus the levies along the Mississippi preventing silt, are causing the Gulf coastline to sink, which needs to be prepared for.

Climate Alarmists are using that data to proof ocean rising all over the globe.

[Martin Hash]

Trump is coming for the Climate Fraudsters:

[The Conservative]

Trump is coming for the Climate Fraudsters:

If they are found to be frauds, they should be forced to resign.