People being poor humans

[PartyOf5]

A lady on an American Airlines flight reclined her seat. Guy behind her did not appreciate it. She moved it back so he eat, then went back into recline position. Guy starts pushing (she called it punching) the back of the seat. She took video of the incident. After see a couple clips of the video and reading some of the articles I came to the conclusion both passengers are poor humans. Then I some other details jumped out at me and made the people look even worse.

Here's a good article explaining the incident:
https://www.click2houston.com/news/nati ... rong-here/

Here's one with the video: https://www.travelandleisure.com/travel ... lined-seat

Both passengers acted like A-holes.
The guy acting like a child with the pushing and tapping of the seat to irritate her.
The lady is seen *in her own video* smirking, she doesn't look like shes in pain or uncomfortable at all. Yet now she wants the FBI to find the guy so she can sue him for assault. This is what snowflakes now consider assault.
She says she has a bad back and the "assault" made it worse. I bet she never mentioned that to the guy behind her or to the flight attendant. She's turning around and smirking at the guy, so how bad was her back? Yet now she's going for the big payday claiming she was injured in an assault in which she was never touched.
If her back was so bad that this caused her additional damage, why are you flying? Turbulence can be worse than that.
I mention snowflake. She is a school teacher who was traveling back from a teacher convention.
School teacher on public paid trip is flying first class.
Being first class, the guy still has room to use the tray. It may be a bit annoying, but it's not like there is so little space he can't even move the tray down.
She already managed to get the flight attendant fired for not taking her side in the incident.

[Speaker to Animals]

I refuse to fly and have not experienced the high capacity seating (that stuff got horrific since the last time I flew almost twenty years ago). But still.. regardless of either of these people's behavior, the recliners are the camp clearly in the wrong. They are the ones instigating the problem and not taking into account the impact of their behavior upon others. They remind me of smokers, honestly, and for that I take the side of the laptop users.

One thing a decent human being could do is simply ask the person behind them if it would be okay to recline. You can work out a compromise setting where the person behind can still eat or work, etc. Like.. the same thing we all do when piling into a car and working out an acceptable passenger seat position. But, no, recliners only care about their comfort and fuck the person behind them.

I'd gas the bitch, personally. I absolutely loathe this attitude that one should just do whatever comforts them and it's somebody else's problem if that causes distress or discomfort upon them.


I bet this bitch drives twenty mph slower than the speed limit in the left lane, actively keeping people from passing, and just chugs along soaking it up through her rear-view mirror. It's the same thing with smokers who just stand outside a toy store doorway smoking into children's lungs. They don't give a shit. They want their comfort and pleasure and everybody else just has to endure their presence. They don't add any value to society, really. This woman is a government school teacher, flying to a bullshit conference on the dime of the tax payers of Charlotte, not just useless but probably making society worse in her capacity as a do-nothing teacher. And is that a fucking first class seat?? Maybe Hitler was right.

[heydaralon]

Sounds like a classic case of racial profiling. That woman needs to sue: the airline, The department of transportation, the airport this happened in, the city the airport is in, the county the city is in, and the state that the county is in, plus the white male assailant. Kind of weird to see two white supremacists above me taking the side of the man, but typical I guess.

[Speaker to Animals]

I am not totally joking either. There exists a certain type of personality in the American population whereby this person actually receives pleasure in making life miserable for everybody else. We all see them every day on the roads creating bottlenecks, traffic jams, and then playing victim when people get upset with their cunt driving behavior.

We see them as smokers polluting everybody's air with carcinogens and joking about it. HA HA HA I just exposed you to cancer don't be such a baby about it.

What about parents that refuse to vaccinate their children and then spread diseases throughout the schools? Fuck your kids, I don't believe in this and your kid's health is not my problem.

I am sure you could catalog a host of contexts in which this behavior manifests, but it very clearly comes down to a certain kind of cunt personality type.


If your behavior is going to cause discomfort and inconvenience upon other people in society, maybe don't be a cunt, especially when you can compromise or avoid the problem.

[Fife]

[Manwithnoname]

Balls! You lot are more armed than the rest of the world, and still manage to be completely obnoxious.

Not that standing your ground and saying as it is, is a bad thing, but that quote is bumf.

As for the OP... that is why I’m a cunt. Other people piss me off. Way back when I was a nice guy, but time wounded all heels so now instead of holding the door I let it slam in their face.

[Speaker to Animals]

I dunno. There is a deeper truth to this. Watch the video of that smug bitch's smirk as she lowers the seat just to ruin the man's entire flight. That's the smirk of a useless woman who enjoys immunity from getting smacked the fuck out. If you behave like that to another man, there is a chance that dude is going to blast you in the fucking face, but a lot of women are immune to repercussions (because nobody really wants to knock them out, obviously), but it gets to their heads and they just become total cunts, enjoying the ability to provoke men and then play the victim if the man pushes back.

Even amongst men, the chances of having to square up are so low now that a lot of weaker men are behaving like this too. It also makes men weaker in that it gives them a sense of power without ever having to get stronger or learn to fight at all. In times past, if you wanted to be a cunt like this, you had to learn to fight first because you were definitely going to square up at some point.

And even when you are dealing with stronger men who really can fight, the risks of fighting are enough to just want to avoid that shit altogether. You might win, sure, but you might win at the cost of a tooth or something. Now these little cunt men can start fucking with you and when you knock them down they call the police to have you arrested. It's this total moral inversion we see across society in a lot of ways where weak people gain power in various ways and then proceed to punish the strong. This also dispels the now common myth about "might makes right" being wrong. In a way, might does make right because being mighty is what brings about politeness. In general, the worst behavior I see each day comes from the physically weakest members of society, and they are often the ones who have various forms of soft and hard power (from the provocative woman who plays victim to the weak boomer judge who throws veteran fathers under the bus in family court). It's all fundamentally dishonorable and I find it morally revolting.

It's not so much the guns but the lack of personal consequences for behaving like a cunt.

[Xenophon]

I am not totally joking either. There exists a certain type of personality in the American population whereby this person actually receives pleasure in making life miserable for everybody else. We all see them every day on the roads creating bottlenecks, traffic jams, and then playing victim when people get upset with their cunt driving behavior.

We see them as smokers polluting everybody's air with carcinogens and joking about it. HA HA HA I just exposed you to cancer don't be such a baby about it.

What about parents that refuse to vaccinate their children and then spread diseases throughout the schools? Fuck your kids, I don't believe in this and your kid's health is not my problem.

I am sure you could catalog a host of contexts in which this behavior manifests, but it very clearly comes down to a certain kind of cunt personality type.


If your behavior is going to cause discomfort and inconvenience upon other people in society, maybe don't be a cunt, especially when you can compromise or avoid the problem.

Can someone who's smarter than me enlighten me on how unvaccinated kids infect vaccinated kids?

[Speaker to Animals]

I am not totally joking either. There exists a certain type of personality in the American population whereby this person actually receives pleasure in making life miserable for everybody else. We all see them every day on the roads creating bottlenecks, traffic jams, and then playing victim when people get upset with their cunt driving behavior.

We see them as smokers polluting everybody's air with carcinogens and joking about it. HA HA HA I just exposed you to cancer don't be such a baby about it.

What about parents that refuse to vaccinate their children and then spread diseases throughout the schools? Fuck your kids, I don't believe in this and your kid's health is not my problem.

I am sure you could catalog a host of contexts in which this behavior manifests, but it very clearly comes down to a certain kind of cunt personality type.


If your behavior is going to cause discomfort and inconvenience upon other people in society, maybe don't be a cunt, especially when you can compromise or avoid the problem.

Can someone who's smarter than me enlighten me on how unvaccinated kids infect vaccinated kids?

Vaccination does not confer 100% immunity in all the vaccinated. Not being vaccinated confers 0% immunity, whereas many vaccinated kids have somewhere between 0 and 100% immunity. I am not sure why I have to explain this, but tossing kids with zero percent immunity into a school, who could be infected with measles, significantly increases the odds that other kids with less than 100% immunity immunity get sick. It's just math. If you don't want to vaccinate your kids, then that's on you, but don't dump that shit onto the rest of our children.

[Xenophon]

I am not totally joking either. There exists a certain type of personality in the American population whereby this person actually receives pleasure in making life miserable for everybody else. We all see them every day on the roads creating bottlenecks, traffic jams, and then playing victim when people get upset with their cunt driving behavior.

We see them as smokers polluting everybody's air with carcinogens and joking about it. HA HA HA I just exposed you to cancer don't be such a baby about it.

What about parents that refuse to vaccinate their children and then spread diseases throughout the schools? Fuck your kids, I don't believe in this and your kid's health is not my problem.

I am sure you could catalog a host of contexts in which this behavior manifests, but it very clearly comes down to a certain kind of cunt personality type.


If your behavior is going to cause discomfort and inconvenience upon other people in society, maybe don't be a cunt, especially when you can compromise or avoid the problem.

Can someone who's smarter than me enlighten me on how unvaccinated kids infect vaccinated kids?

Vaccination does not confer 100% immunity in all the vaccinated. Not being vaccinated confers 0% immunity, whereas many vaccinated kids have somewhere between 0 and 100% immunity. I am not sure why I have to explain this, but tossing kids with zero percent immunity into a school, who could be infected with measles, significantly increases the odds that other kids with less than 100% immunity immunity get sick. It's just math. If you don't want to vaccinate your kids, then that's on you, but don't dump that shit onto the rest of our children.

I see. That makes sense. I vaccinate my children, because you can't compare pre-vaccine infection rates and post-vaccine infection rates and come to the conclusion that vaccines are bad. It makes zero sense to me.