SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
And God I can't bear to read another "OMZG the racism against Asians is off the hook!" article. They caused this with their behavior. They eat weird shit. They live in unsanitary conditions even when they allegedly become an economic superpower. Maybe there is a reason for the contempt?
The agricultural revolution was almost ten thousand years ago. You don't need to eat pangolins and exotic cats. For fuck sake.
The scientific revolution occurred. We put people on the Moon. If the Chinese are so high-IQ, then why can't they figure out that pangolin scales do not make their dicks bigger?
The agricultural revolution was almost ten thousand years ago. You don't need to eat pangolins and exotic cats. For fuck sake.
The scientific revolution occurred. We put people on the Moon. If the Chinese are so high-IQ, then why can't they figure out that pangolin scales do not make their dicks bigger?
-
- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:40 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Yeah but their woman are hot, so I give them a pass, even if they are about to destroy us all
Carlin delenda est
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
East Asian women are the least attractive to me... to each his own I guess.Manwithnoname wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 6:09 pmYeah but their woman are hot, so I give them a pass, even if they are about to destroy us all
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
asian women hottest
it is known
it is known
-
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 2:43 am
- Location: suiþiuþu
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Sweden calling.
An nescis, mi fili, quantilla prudentia mundus regatur? - Axel Oxenstierna
Nie lügen die Menschen so viel wie nach einer Jagd, während eines Krieges oder vor Wahlen. - Otto von Bismarck
-
- Posts: 2434
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 10:34 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
"People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome."
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
UK government declared the threat immanent but moderate in severity. Even the most optimistic mortality rate is about the same as the Spanish Flu, so I guess moderate is the Spanish Flu to them.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Really?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:54 amEven the most optimistic mortality rate is about the same as the Spanish Flu
Says who?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
Says WHO.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:09 amReally?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:54 amEven the most optimistic mortality rate is about the same as the Spanish Flu
Says who?
Spanish Flu was about 2.5%.
WHO estimates this is about 2% (though I'd argue that's really low-balled given the data we have).
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/who-to ... -pandemic/
http://virus.stanford.edu/uda/The effect of the influenza epidemic was so severe that the average life span in the US was depressed by 10 years. The influenza virus had a profound virulence, with a mortality rate at 2.5% compared to the previous influenza epidemics, which were less than 0.1%. The death rate for 15 to 34-year-olds of influenza and pneumonia were 20 times higher in 1918 than in previous years (Taubenberger). People were struck with illness on the street and died rapid deaths. One anectode shared of 1918 was of four women playing bridge together late into the night. Overnight, three of the women died from influenza (Hoagg). Others told stories of people on their way to work suddenly developing the flu and dying within hours (Henig). One physician writes that patients with seemingly ordinary influenza would rapidly "develop the most viscous type of pneumonia that has ever been seen" and later when cyanosis appeared in the patients, "it is simply a struggle for air until they suffocate," (Grist, 1979). Another physician recalls that the influenza patients "died struggling to clear their airways of a blood-tinged froth that sometimes gushed from their nose and mouth," (Starr, 1976). The physicians of the time were helpless against this powerful agent of influenza. In 1918 children would skip rope to the rhyme (Crawford):
That's just based on the cooked numbers the Chinese central government is allowing out. No reason to believe that these numbers are worse than reality, and actually quite a lot of reasons to believe the situation is much worse than those numbers let on.
I am honestly not going to waste time arguing with you either. You either prepare or you don't. It's not my problem now. We are past the debate stage. I am just sharing interesting information here at this point. Your life is your responsibility. If you are not concerned enough to take the most basic precautions, then I hope the best for you. Darwin Protocol is in effect.
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: SARS Pt. 2 - Wuhan Boogaloo
The rate may be the same as Spanish flu but that doesn't mean 50 million people are going to die.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:24 amSays WHO.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:09 amReally?Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Tue Feb 11, 2020 6:54 amEven the most optimistic mortality rate is about the same as the Spanish Flu
Says who?
Spanish Flu was about 2.5%.
WHO estimates this is about 2% (though I'd argue that's really low-balled given the data we have).
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/who-to ... -pandemic/
That's just based on the cooked numbers the Chinese central government is allowing out. No reason to believe that these numbers are worse than reality, and actually quite a lot of reasons to believe the situation is much worse.
I am honestly not going to waste time arguing with you either. You either prepare or you don't. It's not my problem now. We are past the debate stage. I am just sharing interesting information here at this point. Your life is your responsibility. If you are not concerned enough to take the most basic precautions, then I hope the best for you. Darwin Protocol is in effect.
Public healthcare 100 years ago was nowhere near as advanced as it is now and the spread of the virus in 1919-1920 was exacerbated by millions of troops returning home from the war.
This may yet kill 10,000 people in China but it is not going to cause millions of deaths worldwide.
As far as I know, there has not been a death outside of China yet.
I get it, you enjoy prepping. You probably had the same panic attacks over SARS, MERS and Ebola but you are still more likely to die in a traffic accident or by a gunshot wound.
Last edited by Montegriffo on Tue Feb 11, 2020 7:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.