MHF Democrat Primary Poll

[Speaker to Animals]

LOL, nope. Nice try, though.

[StCapps]

LOL, nope. Nice try, though.

Biden and Warren doing so much better than Yang and Gabbard it's laughable. You're a joke.

[pineapplemike]

we spent months talking biden but now the top 3 is what the bet was? weak

[StCapps]

we spent months talking biden but now the top 3 is what the bet was? weak

We talked about the top 3 for extended periods early in the race. StA brought up his top 3, thinking it aged well, so I decided to laugh in his face and point out my top 3 was infinitely more accurate. Even if we are talking about who was most likely to win, StA didn't even pick Sanders off the hop, he thought Tulsi was going to win. I was the one telling him that Sanders is infinitely more likely to win then either Gabbard or Yang, and he would not shut up about Tulsi regardless. Talk about posts that age poorly in this thread, StA is the king of those.

Revisionist history is a helluva drug.

[Speaker to Animals]

we spent months talking biden but now the top 3 is what the bet was? weak

Seriously.

He didn't even give three. He was all Biden all the time, and specifically said Bernie would become irrelevant as the debates carried on. LOL

And it's not like I am Nostradamus here. Who the fuck was seriously going to vote for Joe Biden?? LMFAO. Bernie was huge before the campaign even began. Warren's fake progressive campaign was the only threat to Bernie, but that still wouldn't have helped Biden win since either Warren or Bernie had to collapse going into the primary votes. I am actually amazed he is winning after a heart attack, but whatever.

Maybe I should put this as a signature until people finally get it: THE MEDIA NARRATIVE IS NOT REALITY.

[StCapps]

we spent months talking biden but now the top 3 is what the bet was? weak

Seriously.

He didn't even give three. He was all Biden all the time

Wrong. Always had Bernie in my top 3.

[SuburbanFarmer]

Imagining that your top 3 applies to the general voting populace is a helluva drug.

[Speaker to Animals]

So after Yang and Gabbard don't bring down the establishment, while Bernie Sanders becomes increasingly irrelevant at these next debates, is that when certain folks admit they were wrong about the Democrat Party and the viability of outsiders with ideas was vastly overblown due to a misread of Trump's success in the 2016 election? Or will they continue to cling to their wishful thinking analysis?

21 July 2019

Did. Not. Age. Well.

This was never about the top three. You never gave three options. You always were against the idea of Bernie winning this thing.

[StCapps]

Imagining that your top 3 applies to the general voting populace is a helluva drug.

My top 3 was based on perception of the general voting populace, StA's was not.

[StCapps]

So after Yang and Gabbard don't bring down the establishment, while Bernie Sanders becomes increasingly irrelevant at these next debates, is that when certain folks admit they were wrong about the Democrat Party and the viability of outsiders with ideas was vastly overblown due to a misread of Trump's success in the 2016 election? Or will they continue to cling to their wishful thinking analysis?

21 July 2019

Did. Not. Age. Well.

This was never about the top three. You never gave three options. You always were against the idea of Bernie winning this thing.

I was against putting Bernie at number one, never said it was crazy to have him number two or number three. It was about the top 3 for a good chunk of the early discussion, because it was so early in the process. If it was never about the top 3, why did you quote your top 3 as your cherry picked post?