Use that brain you claim you have short bus.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 2:23 pmIs the Warsaw act related to the Warsaw Pact?The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 2:11 pmIt is meant to be tough to pass because it requires bipartisan support, which isn't going to happen.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 2:00 pm
After a quick search it seems to me that it has probably been violated by every President since it was passed into law.
Even Trump may have violated it with his attack on the Syrian airbase.
Plenty of speculation that it is unconstitutional anyway.
At the end of the day, if the President is to have the title of Commander in Chief then he has ultimate authority over the military.
As for whether Trump should be impeached or not that depends upon whether you think a President should be held to account for wrongdoings or not.
It's a massively floored procedure anyway. A 2/3rds majority in a partisan Senate makes it nearly impossible to obtain a conviction.
On the other hand, if no action or threat of action was ever taken to bring a President to order then there's little to stop one breaking whatever laws they want to for personal gain.
Oh, and a side note, you either break the warsaw act or you don't, there is no maybe...
Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Oh shut your Krakow.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Ok snowflake. And you did this right after calling me a snowflake for calling out your trolling.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 1:36 pmApparently I'm not allowed an opinion on US politics.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 1:24 pmmonte, is violating the war powers act more or less impeachable than trump's phone call with ukraine?
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
This Impeachmas has been quite a ride in silliness. In Desperate times, Desperate measures.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
-
C-Mag
- Posts: 28305
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:48 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Mostly.
Rinos in the Senate are trying to figure out how to get out of this shit too, without giving Trump a win.
Rinos in the Senate are trying to figure out how to get out of this shit too, without giving Trump a win.
PLATA O PLOMO
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
Don't fear authority, Fear Obedience
-
pineapplemike
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
On what? Not willing to be around women by himself?
#NotOneRedCent
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
I'm sure this has been their plan all along. They were never going to be happy ousting Trump just to get POTUS Pence. They have likely been working on ways to set him up since 2016. That rule about never being in a room alone with a woman is looking like an even better idea now.
