-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Wed Dec 25, 2019 9:25 am
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Wed Dec 25, 2019 8:14 am
war powers act was in the 1970s
was referring to obama in libya
Obama decided that bringing democracy to Libya was more important than obeying U.S. law. The War Powers Act, passed by Congress in 1973 in the waning days of the Vietnam War, requires presidents to terminate military attacks abroad after 60 days unless Congress specifically approves the intervention. Immediately after the bombing commenced, Secretary of State Clinton declared during a classified briefing for members of Congress that “the White House would forge ahead with military action in Libya even if Congress passed a resolution constraining the mission.” Echoing the Bush administration the Obama administration indicated that congressional restraints would be “an unconstitutional encroachment on executive power.”
https://mises.org/wire/obamas-awol-anti-war-protest
I agree btw...
What pisses me off is people want to give democracy to everyone else, when in reality we shoukd suggest a constitutional republic.
#NotOneRedCent
-
clubgop
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Post
by clubgop » Wed Dec 25, 2019 3:33 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 25, 2019 7:28 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Wed Dec 25, 2019 7:02 am
pineapplemike wrote: ↑Tue Dec 24, 2019 4:57 pm
violating the war powers act seemed pretty f'd up
Which president?
Every single one since Washington.
The War powers act was 1973 try again dumbass.
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Post
by PartyOf5 » Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:28 am
clubgop wrote: ↑Wed Dec 25, 2019 3:33 pm
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Wed Dec 25, 2019 7:28 am
Every single one since Washington.
The War powers act was 1973 try again dumbass.
More proof Monty is nothing more than a trolling partisan hack.
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:11 am
Every president since Washington makes me a partisan hack?
Literally making the point that they are all the same but OK. Merry fucking Christmas to you pair of bitter wankers.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:22 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:11 am
Every president since Washington makes me a partisan hack?
Literally making the point that they are all the same but OK. Merry fucking Christmas to you pair of bitter wankers.
You are talking about a law that didn't exist for the majority of the country, so yea... you are.
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:39 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:22 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:11 am
Every president since Washington makes me a partisan hack?
Literally making the point that they are all the same but OK. Merry fucking Christmas to you pair of bitter wankers.
You are talking about a law that didn't exist for the majority of the country, so yea... you are.
Do you need a link to the definition of partisan?
literally making the point that they are all the same
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
The Conservative
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Post
by The Conservative » Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:15 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:39 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:22 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:11 am
Every president since Washington makes me a partisan hack?
Literally making the point that they are all the same but OK. Merry fucking Christmas to you pair of bitter wankers.
You are talking about a law that didn't exist for the majority of the country, so yea... you are.
Do you need a link to the definition of partisan?
literally making the point that they are all the same
Partisan Hack
#NotOneRedCent
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Post
by Montegriffo » Thu Dec 26, 2019 11:01 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 10:15 am
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:39 am
The Conservative wrote: ↑Thu Dec 26, 2019 8:22 am
You are talking about a law that didn't exist for the majority of the country, so yea... you are.
Do you need a link to the definition of partisan?
literally making the point that they are all the same
Partisan Hack
Right, so since I have consistently attacked both Corbyn and Boris and voted for neither then partisan doesn't match my position.
My support was for the Lib Dems based on their position on the two issues most important to me personally ie the environment and remaining in the UK.
You are simply equating my distaste for Trump as partisan when in fact it is based on his words, policies and actions not his party.
I have never shown support for Hillary or Trump or their respective parties.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
PartyOf5
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Post
by PartyOf5 » Thu Dec 26, 2019 11:12 am
Don't think it went unnoticed that you are only disputing the partisan accusation and not the trolling one. You are still both. This latest attempt may have been simply trolling.
-
pineapplemike
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Post
by pineapplemike » Thu Dec 26, 2019 11:17 am
i wouldnt say partisan but monte being ignorant of specific US policies seems accurate in this case. whatevs
war powers act, 1973, intended to limit executive war authority, in practice has given executive even more war authority. especially when they ignore it.
impeachable? what u think monte