Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)

[Montegriffo]

absolute worst case scenario re: aid story, there's no fucking way it rises to the level of impeachment. and especially the second article "obstructing congress" or whatever, get real

Unlike lying about having sex with someone not your wife.
Thank heavens Trump would never do such a thing.

[clubgop]

absolute worst case scenario re: aid story, there's no fucking way it rises to the level of impeachment. and especially the second article "obstructing congress" or whatever, get real

Unlike lying about having sex with someone not your wife.
Thank heavens Trump would never do such a thing.

Perjury, suborning perjury trying to rob an innocent women of her day in court. Of course you don't like it when victims try to get justice.

[clubgop]

I'm curious. Do you still believe there's absolutely nothing to the aid story, or that its just not important what he did? If it's the former, why won't he let his minions testify? Had they testified and presented compelling evidence that there was nothing there, he might not have been impeached. Continuing to prevent his aides from testifying is more or less the White House taking the 5th. Fair or not, taking the 5th always leads impartial observers to believe the party doing it has something criminal to hide.

Which one the story has changed through the years.

They wanted to impeach Trump since day one. So which story are we talking about?

The one that originated in July of this year, the one about which you said "If it went exactly as stated, and there was no hearsay, but there was true proof... I'd be demanding his resignation..."

If we are going to be quoting here wasn't it your bitch ass that said Dems shouldn't be pursuing impeachment without a Senate to convict? How quickly did that change, hack bitch. Yesterday was Wednesday, so the guy drank peach tea all day so you could swim in impeach piss all night.

[PartyOf5]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... osi-senate

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats may wait to send their articles of impeachment against President Trump to the GOP-controlled Senate, for fear that they are incapable of holding a fair trial.

Wait, what there Nancy? The Democrats have gone full retard. You never go full retard. Peak hypocrite right there.

But wait, there's more.

Pelosi was then asked about possibly withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate until they get certain reassurances, and the Speaker refused to give a direct answer.

So what you're doing here is exactly what you are accusing Trump of doing, and you told us those are impeachable offenses.

"Let me tell you what I don't consider a fair trial," she told the crowd of reporters. "This is what I don't consider a fair trial -- that Leader McConnell has stated that he's not an impartial juror,

Impartial like the House Democrats who were saying they were going to impeach Trump even before this Ukraine call took place? Would that be impartial? Yet they were allowed to vote without a peep of concern.

How early can I vote for 2020? I just want this over already.

[pineapplemike]

absolute worst case scenario re: aid story, there's no fucking way it rises to the level of impeachment. and especially the second article "obstructing congress" or whatever, get real

Unlike lying about having sex with someone not your wife.
Thank heavens Trump would never do such a thing.

wouldnt you say the abuse of the power dynamic between a sitting president and a 20 something year old intern is worse than lying about it*?

*under oath

[The Conservative]

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... osi-senate

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Democrats may wait to send their articles of impeachment against President Trump to the GOP-controlled Senate, for fear that they are incapable of holding a fair trial.

Wait, what there Nancy? The Democrats have gone full retard. You never go full retard. Peak hypocrite right there.

But wait, there's more.

Pelosi was then asked about possibly withholding the articles of impeachment from the Senate until they get certain reassurances, and the Speaker refused to give a direct answer.

So what you're doing here is exactly what you are accusing Trump of doing, and you told us those are impeachable offenses.

"Let me tell you what I don't consider a fair trial," she told the crowd of reporters. "This is what I don't consider a fair trial -- that Leader McConnell has stated that he's not an impartial juror,

Impartial like the House Democrats who were saying they were going to impeach Trump even before this Ukraine call took place? Would that be impartial? Yet they were allowed to vote without a peep of concern.

How early can I vote for 2020? I just want this over already.

Can Trump recall these people for not following their oath?

[brewster]

absolute worst case scenario re: aid story, there's no fucking way it rises to the level of impeachment. and especially the second article "obstructing congress" or whatever, get real

Unlike lying about having sex with someone not your wife.
Thank heavens Trump would never do such a thing.

wouldnt you say the abuse of the power dynamic between a sitting president and a 20 something year old intern is worse than lying about it*?

*under oath

The accusation is he withheld congressionally appropriated military aid funds to an ally in a war against one of our foes that has claimed over 10,000 lives, in order to achieve an electoral advantage. If you can't see that as far more of a "high crime and misdemeanor" than lying about sex there's no hope for this republic.

[The Conservative]

Unlike lying about having sex with someone not your wife.
Thank heavens Trump would never do such a thing.

wouldnt you say the abuse of the power dynamic between a sitting president and a 20 something year old intern is worse than lying about it*?

*under oath

The accusation is he withheld congressionally appropriated military aid funds to an ally in a war against one of our foes that has claimed over 10,000 lives, in order to achieve an electoral advantage. If you can't see that as far more of a "high crime and misdemeanor" than lying about sex there's no hope for this republic.

You mean like this?




And what proof do you have of what you claim about holding funds?

[The Conservative]

I'm curious. Do you still believe there's absolutely nothing to the aid story, or that its just not important what he did? If it's the former, why won't he let his minions testify? Had they testified and presented compelling evidence that there was nothing there, he might not have been impeached. Continuing to prevent his aides from testifying is more or less the White House taking the 5th. Fair or not, taking the 5th always leads impartial observers to believe the party doing it has something criminal to hide.

Which one the story has changed through the years.

They wanted to impeach Trump since day one. So which story are we talking about?

The one that originated in July of this year, the one about which you said "If it went exactly as stated, and there was no hearsay, but there was true proof... I'd be demanding his resignation..."

And was there?

[The Conservative]

Democrats: "Trump has been Impeached."

The 62 Million that voted for Trump.: