This dude nails it, suck it Monte.
UK election
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: UK election
*yip*
-
Smitty-48
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: UK election
The Corbynite pseudo radicals are defeated.
Rejoice ! Rejoice !
Unleash the state security forces upon the UKAntifa terrorists, sink their Belgrano !
No mercy, no quarter for the Corbyntine Junta !
Rejoice ! Rejoice !
Unleash the state security forces upon the UKAntifa terrorists, sink their Belgrano !
No mercy, no quarter for the Corbyntine Junta !
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
StCapps
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
Montegriffo
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: UK election
Boris is not your freind.TheReal_ND wrote: ↑Fri Dec 13, 2019 7:52 pmI'm not pleased with the result of this election at all. I would have preferred a win for labor. Sure labor sucks. People should not put faith in conservative parties however
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9586740/b ... s-amnesty/BORIS JOHNSON has paved the way for an amnesty for 500,000 illegal immigrants – insisting the Government will “look at it”.
Speaking in the Commons yesterday, the new PM said he had raised the idea of an amnesty when he served under Theresa May, “and it did not receive an overwhelming endorsement”.He said the Windrush scandal had shown the difficulties that can be caused by a mass expulsion of people who “may have been living and working here for many, many years without being involved in any criminal activity at all”.
“We should look at it,” he said. “And the truth is the law already basically allows them an effective amnesty.”
He separately confirmed that Theresa May’s net migration target of 100,000 a year would go.
The PM’s official spokesman said he “wasn’t interested in a numbers game”.Boris Johnson called for an “earned amnesty” for as many as 400,000 illegal immigrants when he was Mayor of London.
He said that anyone who had been living in the capital for more than five years could show their “commitment to this society” and be given the right to stay – so they could then pay taxes.
Announcing the controversial move in 2008, he agreed it would be better if illegal immigrants were “taken and sent back to their place of origin” but added “it is just not going to happen”.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
