Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It's just a way of airing your dirty laundry in public isn't it?
It's like a court with a jury biased in favour of the defendant.
It might swing a few undecided voters and that's about it.
It's like a court with a jury biased in favour of the defendant.
It might swing a few undecided voters and that's about it.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Hockey puck = round.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 amIt is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:37 amThen create your own hockey topic, don't need derail a legitimate and relevant topic.
There is your circular argument.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 amHockey puck = round.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 amIt is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:37 am
Then create your own hockey topic, don't need derail a legitimate and relevant topic.
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Produce interesting content or the thread will go off topic, who knew?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 amKinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 amHockey puck = round.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 amIt is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 amKinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 amHockey puck = round.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 6:50 amIt is not legitimate or relevant. It's people arguing in circles, adding nothing of value, aside from trolling other forum members, and the last five pages are better than any of the trolling done in all the previous pages combined. If you want to go back to repeating yourself over and over again, ad nauseam, knock yourself out, but don't pretend that is somehow riveting content and this thread is precious, because it's fucking not. This thread being derailed was infinitely more entertaining than this thread "on the rails".
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It was a lame dad joke at best.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 amIt was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 amKinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
Hockey puck = round.
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
/shrugs
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
I never saw that punch coming, total sucker punch.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 amIt was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 amKinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
Hockey puck = round.
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
Didn't hold it against her, the opposite really. Nothing wrong with a bit of spirit in your totty.
It was the rows about politics which killed the relationship in the end. She was smart though, could have an intelligent conversation with her in just about any topic.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14794
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
I'm a dad. So I'll take what I can get.StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:23 amIt was a lame dad joke at best.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:14 amIt was tongue in cheek humor, something well above your intellect or pay-grade, go back to being beaten by English Wenches and you'll be safe.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 am
Kinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
/shrugs
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Quit your whining and get lost already, take your MSM talking points and go.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
If they're not talking about Marty Hash, they're off topic anyways,StCapps wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:11 amProduce interesting content or the thread will go off topic, who knew?Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 9:09 amKinda weakens your argument about staying on topic if you are just going to get into a spatt with repeatobot about staying on topic.The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 22, 2019 8:44 am
Hockey puck = round.
There is your circular argument.
Enlighten us on your latest thoughts about the impeachment if you want the thread to stay on topic.
Technically, this forum is about and for the promotion of Martin Hash Esq.
The DCF Refugee area was just a lifeboat, after Nukedog sunk the DCF
There was never any mandate here to do anything but keep in touch.
Moreover, this is what the DCF was like, thread jacking was what the DCF was all about.
Who the fuck is PartyOf5? I don't even remember this tool being on the DCF
If this is perpetuating the DCF, I'm Smitty-48, who the fucks are these clowns here?
Nec Aspera Terrent