No need for the heads up, I'm well aware. These NPC's cant even come up with any new talking points, it's all old material.
Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
*yip*
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
It's all here in the thread, both Brewster and I have covered it.
I'm not going to hold your hand and explain it all over again when there are far more interesting topics at hand right now.
I'm not going to hold your hand and explain it all over again when there are far more interesting topics at hand right now.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
That's true, impeachment talk is boring, and you certainly have nothing interesting to say about it Captain Vague.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:23 pmthere are far more interesting topics at hand right now.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
GOP standard defense #2, after "did not!" is claiming there's no such thing as an actual professional, whether government official, private employee or academic, everyone is a partisan tool so there no such thing as an educated informed opinion. The GOP chutzpah to claim that all these varied diverse people, from lifelong bureaucrats to career military to appointed diplomats, are ALL lying for partisan gains will be studied and written about for many years by students of how democracies fail.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 14791
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
I think this states the entire hearing in less than 5 minutes:
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4832888/ ... r-calls-is
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4832888/ ... r-calls-is
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 3657
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2016 11:15 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
No educated, informed opinion involves calling this impeachable. Oh, the witnesses aren't lying when they say it is their opinion this is what Trump meant, but people's opinions, based on hearsay, do not prove anything.brewster wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 4:26 pmGOP standard defense #2, after "did not!" is claiming there's no such thing as an actual professional, whether government official, private employee or academic, everyone is a partisan tool so there no such thing as an educated informed opinion. The GOP chutzpah to claim that all these varied diverse people, from lifelong bureaucrats to career military to appointed diplomats, are ALL lying for partisan gains will be studied and written about for many years by students of how democracies fail.
The only reason this has gotten as far as it has is because Democrats demanded impeachment the day Trump was elected. Russia, Russia, Russia blew up in the faces, so given the election is fast approaching they had to reach for something, anything to use as an excuse. Unfortunately for Democrats this is even weaker than Russia. They look like fools, but the Dem politicians and their MSM allies are doing all they can to try and convince American voters that this turd they cooked up is chocolate cake. This is nothing more than a 2020 campaign stunt.
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
That is simply not true, especially when it is framed as bribery. Any refutation is simply a "no true scotsman" argument. Even Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said that President Donald Trump had "arguably walked into the area of bribery" with his actions toward Ukraine, pointing out that it appears to be "an impeachable offense." So now he's a Leftist Tool too?
Https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-legal ... se-1461554
The Democratic center really did not want this, knowing it would simply unite the right. Pelosi didn't, I certainly didn't. But Trump went beyond the pale, to where not investigating was abdicating legal responsibility.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Its retardation, PartyOf5 repeats his talking point for the umpteenth time, brewster repeats his, wash, rinse, repeat for ever and ever, as if they are ever going to concede anything. Derrr.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:25 pmThat's true, impeachment talk is boringMontegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 2:23 pmthere are far more interesting topics at hand right now.
Last edited by Smitty-48 on Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
There is no proof of bribery, framing it as bribery is a joke. Trump did not go beyond the pale, you just wish he did. Boring.brewster wrote: ↑Thu Nov 21, 2019 9:51 pmThat is simply not true, especially when it is framed as bribery. Any refutation is simply a "no true scotsman" argument. Even Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said that President Donald Trump had "arguably walked into the area of bribery" with his actions toward Ukraine, pointing out that it appears to be "an impeachable offense." So now he's a Leftist Tool too?
Https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-legal ... se-1461554
The Democratic center really did not want this, knowing it would simply unite the right. Pelosi didn't, I certainly didn't. But Trump went beyond the pale, to where not investigating was abdicating legal responsibility.
*yip*
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Beyond boring, two idiots talking to a wall, neither one getting anywhere, it's like mental illness
They could just switch so repeating "you" "no, you" in every single post and it would be the same result.
It's like a disease of the brain where people can no longer understand what an impasse is, and why it's pointless to just keep repeating yourself as nauseum therein
Nec Aspera Terrent