Dirty dick.Hastur wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:22 amThe picture is funny. Someone should have thought up a better caption. It now only shows what's on Montes mind. He spends his time thinking about Brexit, Boris and Dick.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:16 amAnd? One picture of someone that has no standing in British politics or culture, and you know it.
That's like making fun of AOC, the memes write themselves.
Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Homophobia is sooo funny.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
As I said, the memes write themselves. There is a reason why the US got away from the UK...Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:03 amNo standing in British politics?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:16 amAnd? One picture of someone that has no standing in British politics or culture, and you know it.
That's like making fun of AOC, the memes write themselves.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
You also said ''someone that has no standing in British politics''.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:12 amAs I said, the memes write themselves. There is a reason why the US got away from the UK...Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:03 amNo standing in British politics?The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 4:16 am
And? One picture of someone that has no standing in British politics or culture, and you know it.
That's like making fun of AOC, the memes write themselves.
Care to explain how that applies to the British Prime Minister?
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
So tell me, is he relevant? Because out of everything I've seen so far he is a joke.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:21 amYou also said ''someone that has no standing in British politics''.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:12 amAs I said, the memes write themselves. There is a reason why the US got away from the UK...
Care to explain how that applies to the British Prime Minister?
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
Is the British Prime Minister relevant to British Politics?
A more relevant question would be ''are you really this fucking dumb?''
A more relevant question would be ''are you really this fucking dumb?''
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14797
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
You obviously think he's a dick... so I ask the question again.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:35 amIs the British Prime Minister relevant to British Politics?
A more relevant question would be ''are you really this fucking dumb?''
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
-
- Posts: 25287
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 6:50 am
- Location: Ohio
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Meme Thread for Memes and other assorted Lulz
My opinion of him has no bearing on his relevance in British Politics.The Conservative wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:16 amYou obviously think he's a dick... so I ask the question again.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Tue Nov 19, 2019 9:35 amIs the British Prime Minister relevant to British Politics?
A more relevant question would be ''are you really this fucking dumb?''
My question is rhetorical.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.