A criminal in the States though with your age of consent at 18. He can't admit that he fucked her in London but then hope to be believed when he says that he didn't have sex with her in New York and on Epstein's island.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:09 amI think, if strict material proof of his lying gets out that relates directly to a lie about his sexual activities (not just the stupid lies about sweating and so forth), the Queen is going to strip his titles. Her dynasty is more important than this shit.
All the little lies are utterly unbecoming of an officer. "It could not possibly be me because I do not sweat, lolol" is E4 Mafia tier bullshit. He is English aristocracy, bred to be a dread military commander. The man is almost 60 and behaves like a child.
If he did it, he might as well just admit it and take his lashes ike a man. The allegations were not even criminal. He fucked a17 year old? Come on. Worthy of losing your title as a duke, but not criminal.
Prince Andrew
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Prince Andrew
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Prince Andrew
No you don't, you blubbering Marxist twit, you're too much of softie woftie and you know it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:12 amI certainly do demand men of honour, especially in positions of power.
You English have gone soft as warm baby shit.
If you demanded men of honor, he would have shot himself already.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Prince Andrew
It ranges between 14 and 16.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:16 amA criminal in the States though with your age of consent at 18. He can't admit that he fucked her in London but then hope to be believed when he says that he didn't have sex with her in New York and on Epstein's island.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:09 amI think, if strict material proof of his lying gets out that relates directly to a lie about his sexual activities (not just the stupid lies about sweating and so forth), the Queen is going to strip his titles. Her dynasty is more important than this shit.
All the little lies are utterly unbecoming of an officer. "It could not possibly be me because I do not sweat, lolol" is E4 Mafia tier bullshit. He is English aristocracy, bred to be a dread military commander. The man is almost 60 and behaves like a child.
If he did it, he might as well just admit it and take his lashes ike a man. The allegations were not even criminal. He fucked a17 year old? Come on. Worthy of losing your title as a duke, but not criminal.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Prince Andrew
No it's not. It's not federal jurisdiction, the age of consent in New York State is 17.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:16 amA criminal in the States though with your age of consent at 18.Speaker to Animals wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:09 amI think, if strict material proof of his lying gets out that relates directly to a lie about his sexual activities (not just the stupid lies about sweating and so forth), the Queen is going to strip his titles. Her dynasty is more important than this shit.
All the little lies are utterly unbecoming of an officer. "It could not possibly be me because I do not sweat, lolol" is E4 Mafia tier bullshit. He is English aristocracy, bred to be a dread military commander. The man is almost 60 and behaves like a child.
If he did it, he might as well just admit it and take his lashes ike a man. The allegations were not even criminal. He fucked a17 year old? Come on. Worthy of losing your title as a duke, but not criminal.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 38685
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:59 pm
Re: Prince Andrew
To wit: I knew a guy in the military who enlisted out of rural Texas. He literally dropped his wife off at her high school before cruising in to formation in the morning.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Prince Andrew
It's another all-you-can-eat bluepill buffet up in here. "If only we had a man of honor to lead us all, everything would be swell!"
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Prince Andrew
Look at this here;
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10362564/ ... ortsmouth/
Royal Navy recruits running amok and thinking they can get away with it.
Fucking Marxist Britain is butter soft, New Britannia is gutless.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10362564/ ... ortsmouth/
Royal Navy recruits running amok and thinking they can get away with it.
Fucking Marxist Britain is butter soft, New Britannia is gutless.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Prince Andrew
I'm not a Marxist or even a socialist. If I were I'd be all over the forum singing the praises of Corbyn.Smitty-48 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:16 amNo you don't, you blubbering Marxist twit, you're too much of softie woftie and you know it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Mon Nov 18, 2019 8:12 amI certainly do demand men of honour, especially in positions of power.
You English have gone soft as warm baby shit.
If you demanded men of honor, he would have shot himself already.
If you can find one positive thing I've said about Corbyn or even the Labour party I'll be amazed.
I'm a liberal who believes that a centrist like Sir John Major is the best way forward.
I even think that Boris is a liberal at heart but unfortunately he is prepared to pander to the extremes in order to retain power.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 15157
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:47 am
Re: Prince Andrew
Go check on your doggos.