Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
The former Ambassador is thinking above her station, and she's been tutored what to say...
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:09 amThe former Ambassador is thinking above her station, and she's been tutored what to say...
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
You are the last person to talk about Ad hominem anything.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:21 amThe Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:09 amThe former Ambassador is thinking above her station, and she's been tutored what to say...
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
The undercover hack bitches are working overtime here. Look at that gaslighting. Notice how they are only focusing on Ukraine, right now? We are supposed to ignore thier previous behavior and tactics during "Muh Russia" and Kavanaugh hearings. Sure they were partisan hack bitches then but now they are doing everything in good faith. Punky piss swimmer is being dishonest disingenuous bitch hack up and down, here. English Flaggot is being English Flaggot. As per usual.StCapps wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:17 pmThe Democrats are acting far more partisan than the GOP clown, all they have is hearsay, and you are acting like there is a smoking gun. You're such a hack.brewster wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 9:12 pmNot his behavior, the inquiry. It doesn't appear that anyone on the right would change their positions if Jehovah himself took the chair and confirmed that the accusations are 100% true and Trump indeed was extorting Ukraine. They really don't care at all about rule of law as long as they keep power. So the point of the inquiry isn't the truth, everyone on both sides already knows it. It isn't to remove Trump, ain't gonna happen since the Senate GOP is his lapdogs and he could shoot someone on the senate floor and they'd all swear they didn't see it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:47 pmMore conspiracy theories in order to deflect from Trump's behavior.
Yawn...
It's to expose as knee jerk immoral partisans the GOP politicians who will continue to support him long after it's obvious to even the the most diehard that Trump did what he is accused of. Scumbags like Graham who know what a devil they made a deal with because they called him out on it before taking the knee. There's a tiny but important group of voters who actually care about truth and morality, and in the current electoral climate they can swing elections.
At this point the Trump apologists defense is "Ukraine got their aid, so there was no crime", which is like a thief saying he wasn't guilty of robbing the store since he dropped the loot as he was being chased. It's embarrassing hearing this drivel from lawyers who should know better.
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Biden boasting:
Talk about leading the witness.
Talk about leading the witness.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Also, don't forget about this:
JW Investigates if Ousted Ukraine Ambassador Ordered State Dept. to Monitor Journalists, Trump Allies
JW Investigates if Ousted Ukraine Ambassador Ordered State Dept. to Monitor Journalists, Trump Allies
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
You realise that is an ad hom argument right there don't you?The Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:34 amYou are the last person to talk about Ad hominem anything.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:21 amThe Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:09 amThe former Ambassador is thinking above her station, and she's been tutored what to say...
You're attacking me personally rather than addressing the fact you made an ad hom attack on the ambassador.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 16879
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:59 am
- Location: Hamilton, Ontario
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
And she just said something which is true. "The ambassador is there on behest of the president."
Who cares what her feelings are, the president said she was out... she's out. Suck it up buttercup... bloody hell... she is pathetic.
#NotOneRedCent
-
- Posts: 14790
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:43 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
I fixed your argument.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 9:26 amThe Conservative wrote: ↑Fri Nov 15, 2019 8:34 amYou are the last person to talk about Ad hominem anything.
#NotOneRedCent