No, silly it wouldn't be front page news. This doesn't fit the usual shooting narrative. Just 2 dead, a .45 pistol, and an Asian dude as the shooter. This is a dud they will move on to something else. There is a reason why Rush Limbaugh call them "the drive by media." They dont have to make the stories up they just cover them or don't, focus on them or don't. Flood the zone or send some intern who is pretty much a stenographer.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:12 pmso if the impeachment hearings went well there wouldn't be a school shooting?
no wonder all the good posters left this dump
Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
-
- Posts: 7978
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:47 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Last edited by clubgop on Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
if the impeachment started going south for the Democrats there would be a school shooting
i'm outno way the school shooting was because of the impeachment hearings, get real
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
i'm jealous
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
TC was definitely implying that a shooting would be staged to distract from the hearings.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:27 pmif the impeachment started going south for the Democrats there would be a school shootingi'm outno way the school shooting was because of the impeachment hearings, get real
That's why I accused him of promoting conspiracy theories.
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
-
- Posts: 18718
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:14 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
For legal reasons, we are not threatening to destroy U.S. government property with our glorious medieval siege engine. But if we wanted to, we could. But we won’t. But we could.
-
- Posts: 36399
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 3:22 am
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
No joints, waste of dope, I'm all about the water pipe naow.
Nec Aspera Terrent
-
- Posts: 4650
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2016 5:34 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:40 pmTC was definitely implying that a shooting would be staged to distract from the hearings.pineapplemike wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 7:27 pmif the impeachment started going south for the Democrats there would be a school shootingi'm outno way the school shooting was because of the impeachment hearings, get real
That's why I accused him of promoting conspiracy theories.
-
- Posts: 1848
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2016 6:33 pm
Re: Trump Impeachment (Public Hearing)
Not his behavior, the inquiry. It doesn't appear that anyone on the right would change their positions if Jehovah himself took the chair and confirmed that the accusations are 100% true and Trump indeed was extorting Ukraine. They really don't care at all about rule of law as long as they keep power. So the point of the inquiry isn't the truth, everyone on both sides already knows it. It isn't to remove Trump, ain't gonna happen since the Senate GOP is his lapdogs and he could shoot someone on the senate floor and they'd all swear they didn't see it.Montegriffo wrote: ↑Thu Nov 14, 2019 3:47 pmMore conspiracy theories in order to deflect from Trump's behavior.
Yawn...
It's to expose as knee jerk immoral partisans the GOP politicians who will continue to support him long after it's obvious to even the the most diehard that Trump did what he is accused of. Scumbags like Graham who know what a devil they made a deal with because they called him out on it before taking the knee. There's a tiny but important group of voters who actually care about truth and morality, and in the current electoral climate they can swing elections.
At this point the Trump apologists defense is "Ukraine got their aid, so there was no crime", which is like a thief saying he wasn't guilty of robbing the store since he dropped the loot as he was being chased. It's embarrassing hearing this drivel from lawyers who should know better.
We are only accustomed to dealing with like twenty online personas at a time so when we only have about ten people some people have to be strawmanned in order to advance our same relative go nowhere nonsense positions. -TheReal_ND